On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 9:57:57 PM UTC, Recliner wrote:
Richard wrote:
On Thu, 05 Nov 2015 14:54:11 +0000, David C wrote:

On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 02:15:12 -0800 (PST), Offramp
wrote:

We are meant to board buses by the front door and alight by the centre doors.

Why do old people only want to use the front doors for both?

The facility of egress would seem identical.

All our local buses, (S.E.Essex) have but the one door, (at the
front..........) so when we venture into the Capital we are confuzzled
& panciked by this strange extra door.

As for Oyster Readers which don't work with our bus
passes...............

Well, they will one day. It's a shame that the rest of the country is
door-poor, it wasn't always the case of course.

As for old people at the front -- if it's easier (kneeling bus, at the
kerb, proximity of seats) then good luck to them, and this use should
be formalised and stickered. What about the confused/cunning masses,
none of them old, who think they can get on at the centre door of any
bus? I think they're more of a hazard. Is it time to make any door
boarding and alighting standard on all London's buses -- just as many
countries are going in the opposite direction? (France, and to a
lesser extent, Germany.)

Do any London buses (apart from Boris buses) have Oyster readers other than
at the front?

New Routemasters and the Citaros used on routes 507 and 521 have them in other places too. Not on the top deck though with the New Routemasters.

wrote:
On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 9:57:57 PM UTC, Recliner wrote:
Richard wrote:
On Thu, 05 Nov 2015 14:54:11 +0000, David C wrote:

On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 02:15:12 -0800 (PST), Offramp
wrote:

We are meant to board buses by the front door and alight by the centre doors.

Why do old people only want to use the front doors for both?

The facility of egress would seem identical.

All our local buses, (S.E.Essex) have but the one door, (at the
front..........) so when we venture into the Capital we are confuzzled
& panciked by this strange extra door.

As for Oyster Readers which don't work with our bus
passes...............

Well, they will one day. It's a shame that the rest of the country is
door-poor, it wasn't always the case of course.

As for old people at the front -- if it's easier (kneeling bus, at the
kerb, proximity of seats) then good luck to them, and this use should
be formalised and stickered. What about the confused/cunning masses,
none of them old, who think they can get on at the centre door of any
bus? I think they're more of a hazard. Is it time to make any door
boarding and alighting standard on all London's buses -- just as many
countries are going in the opposite direction? (France, and to a
lesser extent, Germany.)

Do any London buses (apart from Boris buses) have Oyster readers other than
at the front?

New Routemasters and the Citaros used on routes 507 and 521 have them in
other places too. Not on the top deck though with the New Routemasters.


The Boris buses do have them on each of the three doors.

On Friday, 6 November 2015 16:52:35 UTC, Recliner wrote:

Do any London buses (apart from Boris buses) have Oyster readers other than at the front?

The Boris buses do have them on each of the three doors.

I think Boris Buses have them as well.

Offramp wrote:
On Friday, 6 November 2015 16:52:35 UTC, Recliner wrote:

Do any London buses (apart from Boris buses) have Oyster readers other than at the front?

The Boris buses do have them on each of the three doors.

I think Boris Buses have them as well.

Have I missed some subtlety in that response?

On Saturday, 7 November 2015 09:48:41 UTC, Recliner wrote:
Offramp wrote:
On Friday, 6 November 2015 16:52:35 UTC, Recliner wrote:

Do any London buses (apart from Boris buses) have Oyster readers other than at the front?

The Boris buses do have them on each of the three doors.

I think Boris Buses have them as well.

Have I missed some subtlety in that response?

No. I thought someone else had added the "I think Boris Buses have them as well" response. I thought a third person was involved. It was unto that non-existent third person that my sarcastic post was addressed.