Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Modern Railways says that the Crossrail to Tring plan is going cold. I
am surprised. They can't be planning to terminate 60% of the trains at Paddington / Old Oak indefinitely. After all, they are talking about extending the Bakerloo southward because Elephant is too near to London to generate significant flow into London... surely Paddington is even nearer. I've been thinking about the different philosophies on the big 3 projects. Thameslink has 12 southern branches, far more than either of the Crossrails. I think with Crossrail 1, the aim is to run 24tph from Paddington to Liverpool Street, and the extensions into the suburbs are less important. But with Thameslink the branches are everything and the tunnel through the middle is just a way of not having to build loads of platforms at Blackfriars and St Pancras. But I think the 12 southern branches on Thameslink is a mistake, and will cause so many people to wait around on the Zone 1 southbound platforms for up to half an hour for their train home that the stations will be regularly closed for crowding. This will be resolved about 6 months after the project opens by ditching about half of the southern branches and running the other ones quarter-hourly. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
No surprise: Crossrail to Tring proposal | London Transport | |||
Boris: Crossrail not yet "signed, sealed and delivered" [was:Transport Secretary vows to finish Crossrail] | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport |