Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015\12\17 19:41, Peter Lawrence wrote:
On 17/12/2015 00:26, Basil Jet wrote: On 2015\12\16 22:33, Peter Lawrence wrote: On 16/12/2015 07:48, Basil Jet wrote: http://www.inat.fr/metro/london/ You might find it easier to save the save it to your hard drive and use a preview or image viewer there. Mostly I like it, but some things are deplorable. The East London line through Whitechapel and the line through Cambridge Heath are the same colour and almost co-linear, so the eye follows them as a single line. Similarly, the Overground lines through Camden Road and South Hampstead acquire an imaginary Primrose Hill connection if you aren't careful. The Chiltern line is one of the lowest layers and the Met is one of the highest layers, causing odd effects where crossing other lines at Northwick Park and West Hampstead. The Southeastern services through Crofton Park are missing. But the portrayal of the West Croydon - Tulse Hill area is an improvement over the standard LC map... even if three lines of nearly the same colour crossing over the same spot just south of Selhurst is a complete disaster. The route shown from Blackfriars to East Croydon, via a link bypassing London Bridge, is currently fiction! Avid readers of this map will be surprised when they pass through Elephant, Herne Hill, Tulse Hill and Crystals, plus innumerable intermediate stations. I disagree strongly with your sentiment. If Thameslink trains run non-stop from Blackfriars to East Croydon, then it doesn't matter much where the line is shown. Since they are planned to call at London Bridge, the portrayal used is probably the best one. The present representation is misleading, which should never be countenanced. I admit that the possible effect on a passenger is only panic that they might be on the wrong train, not that they are actually neing carried to the wrog place. The representation of non-stop routes on this map is alongside their stopping counerparts; whay make one exception? But is it the only exception? Trains from Marylebone to Wembley Stadium are shown alongside Finchley Road and Wembley Park stations. Southern trains are shown calling at Willesden Junction (that's just plain wrong). Tottenham Hale Hackney Downs is shown away from Clapton. The two Bethnal Greens are shown on the same formation. Trains that avoid Lewisham are shown avoiding St Johns as well. Trains from Brixton to Victoria are shown nowhere near Clapham High Street and Wandsworth Road. Watford High Street. c2c trains are shown nowhere near Bromley-By-Bow. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
But is it the only exception? Trains from Marylebone to Wembley Stadium
are shown alongside Finchley Road and Wembley Park stations. Southern trains are shown calling at Willesden Junction (that's just plain wrong). Tottenham Hale Hackney Downs is shown away from Clapton. The two Bethnal Greens are shown on the same formation. Trains that avoid Lewisham are shown avoiding St Johns as well. Trains from Brixton to Victoria are shown nowhere near Clapham High Street and Wandsworth Road. Watford High Street. c2c trains are shown nowhere near Bromley-By-Bow. No comment on most of your list, but trains which avoid Lewisham do indeed avoid St Johns as well, because there are no platforms on the 'avoiding' lines. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015\12\19 22:40, Peter Kennedy wrote:
But is it the only exception? Trains from Marylebone to Wembley Stadium are shown alongside Finchley Road and Wembley Park stations. Southern trains are shown calling at Willesden Junction (that's just plain wrong). Tottenham Hale Hackney Downs is shown away from Clapton. The two Bethnal Greens are shown on the same formation. Trains that avoid Lewisham are shown avoiding St Johns as well. Trains from Brixton to Victoria are shown nowhere near Clapham High Street and Wandsworth Road. Watford High Street. c2c trains are shown nowhere near Bromley-By-Bow. No comment on most of your list, but trains which avoid Lewisham do indeed avoid St Johns as well, because there are no platforms on the 'avoiding' lines. The Lewisham to Nunhead line is shown running "through" St Johns but it misses it completely. Most of the District line stations don't have c2c platforms, but the line is shown running alongside. I've nearly forgotten what we were arguing about. Suffice to say, the Thameslink portrayal near London Bridge is not inconsistent with the rest of the map. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New tube map, new London Connections, no timetables | London Transport | |||
New London Connections map is available | London Transport | |||
New 'London Connections' map with added LO and new family member,TfL Rail | London Transport | |||
A new geographic take on the Tube map | London Transport | |||
New London Connections map... | London Transport |