Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Thousands of rail, bus and Tube passengers enjoyed free
transport on Saturday after London’s Oyster card network collapsed. Barriers are rail and tube stations were opened by staff after Oyster card 'reader' machines used to register the start and end of each journey failed to work throughout the network." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail- transport/12077955/Londons-Oyster-card-system-crashes-giving-thousands- free-travel.html I wonder if this is a random fault, or a "Y2K" type of problem. I remember when the Nottingham City Transport smartcard had one of the latter at New Year in around 2006. -- Roland Perry |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
"Thousands of rail, bus and Tube passengers enjoyed free transport on Saturday after London’s Oyster card network collapsed. Barriers are rail and tube stations were opened by staff after Oyster card 'reader' machines used to register the start and end of each journey failed to work throughout the network." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail- transport/12077955/Londons-Oyster-card-system-crashes-giving-thousands- free-travel.html I wonder if this is a random fault, or a "Y2K" type of problem. I remember when the Nottingham City Transport smartcard had one of the latter at New Year in around 2006. I notice that the handwritten sign says that contactless cards should be used as normal, so the fault was specifically with the Oyster system. Apart from the change of year, there was also the normal New Year's free travel -- I wonder if the attempt to re-set to normal chargeable travel failed? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
-sept ember.org, at 09:38:40 on Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Recliner remarked: I wonder if this is a random fault, or a "Y2K" type of problem. I remember when the Nottingham City Transport smartcard had one of the latter at New Year in around 2006. I notice that the handwritten sign says that contactless cards should be used as normal, so the fault was specifically with the Oyster system. Apart from the change of year, there was also the normal New Year's free travel -- I wonder if the attempt to re-set to normal chargeable travel failed? The free travel thing points even more to a Y2K style problem, if the charging system wasn't active yesterday. In the Nottingham case it wasn't spotted until the 2nd because no buses ran on the 1st. ps I note some NatWest debit cards had outages on the 1st: another Y2K problem perhaps. -- Roland Perry |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote on 02 Jan 2016 at 09:50 ...
In message -sept ember.org, at 09:38:40 on Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Recliner remarked: I wonder if this is a random fault, or a "Y2K" type of problem. I remember when the Nottingham City Transport smartcard had one of the latter at New Year in around 2006. I notice that the handwritten sign says that contactless cards should be used as normal, so the fault was specifically with the Oyster system. Apart from the change of year, there was also the normal New Year's free travel -- I wonder if the attempt to re-set to normal chargeable travel failed? The free travel thing points even more to a Y2K style problem, if the charging system wasn't active yesterday. In the Nottingham case it wasn't spotted until the 2nd because no buses ran on the 1st. ps I note some NatWest debit cards had outages on the 1st: another Y2K problem perhaps. For decades, computer systems have exhibited faults after a holiday period, caused often by problems in restarting hardware or software after a holiday outage or reverting to normal operation after non-standard holiday operation, or caused by changes to the system that were applied during the holiday. Why are you assuming that this particular instance was in any way similar to Y2K? -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 11:12:16 on Sat, 2 Jan
2016, Richard J. remarked: The free travel thing points even more to a Y2K style problem, if the charging system wasn't active yesterday. In the Nottingham case it wasn't spotted until the 2nd because no buses ran on the 1st. ps I note some NatWest debit cards had outages on the 1st: another Y2K problem perhaps. For decades, computer systems have exhibited faults after a holiday period, caused often by problems in restarting hardware or software after a holiday outage or reverting to normal operation after non-standard holiday operation, or caused by changes to the system that were applied during the holiday. Why are you assuming that this particular instance was in any way similar to Y2K? Firstly, because a very similar incident *was* tracked down to that cause, and secondly the other routine issues you mention ought to be well understood and planned for during a holiday period. Plus the fact they are having to talk to their suppliers to work out a fix, rather than applying a clue-bat to the sysadmin-du-jour. -- Roland Perry |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 11:12:16 on Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Richard J. remarked: The free travel thing points even more to a Y2K style problem, if the charging system wasn't active yesterday. In the Nottingham case it wasn't spotted until the 2nd because no buses ran on the 1st. ps I note some NatWest debit cards had outages on the 1st: another Y2K problem perhaps. For decades, computer systems have exhibited faults after a holiday period, caused often by problems in restarting hardware or software after a holiday outage or reverting to normal operation after non-standard holiday operation, or caused by changes to the system that were applied during the holiday. Why are you assuming that this particular instance was in any way similar to Y2K? Firstly, because a very similar incident *was* tracked down to that cause, and secondly the other routine issues you mention ought to be well understood and planned for during a holiday period. Plus the fact they are having to talk to their suppliers to work out a fix, rather than applying a clue-bat to the sysadmin-du-jour. ISTR that the "contracted out" admin and the suppliers are the same people tim |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote on 02 Jan 2016 at 11:32 ...
In message , at 11:12:16 on Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Richard J. remarked: The free travel thing points even more to a Y2K style problem, if the charging system wasn't active yesterday. In the Nottingham case it wasn't spotted until the 2nd because no buses ran on the 1st. ps I note some NatWest debit cards had outages on the 1st: another Y2K problem perhaps. For decades, computer systems have exhibited faults after a holiday period, caused often by problems in restarting hardware or software after a holiday outage or reverting to normal operation after non-standard holiday operation, or caused by changes to the system that were applied during the holiday. Why are you assuming that this particular instance was in any way similar to Y2K? Firstly, because a very similar incident *was* tracked down to that cause, You mean there was a very similar incident 16 years ago? But what is special about 1/1/2016 compared to 1/1/2015, 1/1/2014, etc? and secondly the other routine issues you mention ought to be well understood and planned for during a holiday period. In theory, yes, but in practice there is always a greater risk of a problem following a period of non-standard operations. This is especially so if you're doing a major update of fare tables across the network, which might be "routine" in the sense that you do it every year, but is still a more obvious likely cause than some previously unknown fundamental problem connected with 1/1/2016. Plus the fact they are having to talk to their suppliers to work out a fix, rather than applying a clue-bat to the sysadmin-du-jour. Quite normal if there's a major system outage. It doesn't tell you anything about the cause. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recliner wrote:
Roland Perry wrote: "Thousands of rail, bus and Tube passengers enjoyed free transport on Saturday after London’s Oyster card network collapsed. Barriers are rail and tube stations were opened by staff after Oyster card 'reader' machines used to register the start and end of each journey failed to work throughout the network." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail- transport/12077955/Londons-Oyster-card-system-crashes-giving-thousan ds- free-travel.html I wonder if this is a random fault, or a "Y2K" type of problem. I remember when the Nottingham City Transport smartcard had one of the latter at New Year in around 2006. I notice that the handwritten sign says that contactless cards should be used as normal, so the fault was specifically with the Oyster system. Apart from the change of year, there was also the normal New Year's free travel -- I wonder if the attempt to re-set to normal chargeable travel failed? The free travel ended at 0430 1st Jan and there weren't any reports of problems yesterday. I'm guessing it is relating to the annual fares increase which takes effect today, there was probably some sort of update being pushed out to the gates overnight which has failed. Peter Smyth |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 11:00:45 -0000 (UTC), "Peter Smyth"
wrote: Recliner wrote: Roland Perry wrote: "Thousands of rail, bus and Tube passengers enjoyed free transport on Saturday after London’s Oyster card network collapsed. Barriers are rail and tube stations were opened by staff after Oyster card 'reader' machines used to register the start and end of each journey failed to work throughout the network." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail- transport/12077955/Londons-Oyster-card-system-crashes-giving-thousan ds- free-travel.html I wonder if this is a random fault, or a "Y2K" type of problem. I remember when the Nottingham City Transport smartcard had one of the latter at New Year in around 2006. I notice that the handwritten sign says that contactless cards should be used as normal, so the fault was specifically with the Oyster system. Apart from the change of year, there was also the normal New Year's free travel -- I wonder if the attempt to re-set to normal chargeable travel failed? The free travel ended at 0430 1st Jan and there weren't any reports of problems yesterday. I'm guessing it is relating to the annual fares increase which takes effect today, there was probably some sort of update being pushed out to the gates overnight which has failed. Yes, that appears to have been the problem. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 02/01/2016 11:36, Recliner wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 11:00:45 -0000 (UTC), "Peter Smyth" The free travel ended at 0430 1st Jan and there weren't any reports of problems yesterday. I'm guessing it is relating to the annual fares increase which takes effect today, there was probably some sort of update being pushed out to the gates overnight which has failed. Yes, that appears to have been the problem. If so, why would they be able to accept contact-less cards while Oyster was u/s? Don't the same fares get charged either way? Any why, if all you had to do to get a free trip was to claim to have an Oyster card, would anyone during the outage try to use a contact-less card? -- Clive Page |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster outage | London Transport |