Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
[I'm writing this in the hope that we are all still alive by the time Demon gets its news server working again.] I was in Pentavia Retail Park yesterday, which is on the n/b carriageway of the Watford Way just south of the bridge over Bunns Lane. I wondered why a place that size didn't have some sort of road bridge or tunnel to and from the s/b carriageway. I surmised that the inevitable disruption to the Watford Way during the construction period wasn't worth it. Subsequently I was gobsmacked to discover that the abandoned slip from the M1 to the A41, unused since the M1 ceased terminatiing here in the 1970s (?), is still there in its entirety. It crosses beneath the Watford Way immediately south of Bunns Lane and immediately north of the Pentavia Retail Park. At the A41 end the junction is merely blocked by some concrete slabs sat on the tarmac. The road surface is in ill-repair, and made me think of the XTC lyric "The grass is always greener when it bursts up through concrete". Since the slip is wide enough for two lanes of traffic, especially where it goes under Watford Way, there is no obvious reason why it could not have become Pentavia's access to and from the s/b Watford Way, at minimal cost and with zero disruption to the Watford Way. The only thing I can think of is that they are preserving the slip road intact for some reason. That would explain why the junction with the Watford Way has not been "plainlined" even though the Watford Way must have had its surface replaced once or twice since the 1970s. The slip road is too big a piece of land to lie unused in this expensive part of London without a reason. Has it seen any use since the M1 was extended? -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 11:57:52 -0000, "John Rowland"
wrote: Subsequently I was gobsmacked to discover that the abandoned slip from the M1 to the A41, unused since the M1 ceased terminatiing here in the 1970s (?), is still there in its entirety. See this page for more on the subject : http://www.btinternet.com/~roads/pix.../m1_oldj2.html Sam -- Sam Holloway, Cambridge |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Sam Holloway" wrote in message
... See this page for more on the subject : http://www.btinternet.com/~roads/pix.../m1_oldj2.html Thanks. The 1993 incident sort of explains why it is being kept intact, although I don't see why it could not have been used as access from the retail park as well. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Rowland" wrote in message ... "Sam Holloway" wrote in message ... See this page for more on the subject : http://www.btinternet.com/~roads/pix.../m1_oldj2.html Thanks. The 1993 incident sort of explains why it is being kept intact, although I don't see why it could not have been used as access from the retail park as well. I hadn't realised until I compared the more recent maps with a 1963 OS map (from the time when the M1 finished at Aldenham) that the southbound slip road is on the site of the now-disused railway line from Mill Hill East to Edgware. I'm not sure that I agree with the OP that the slip road would be wide enough for two lanes of traffic. Interesting that the junction was constructed with single-lane slip roads leading from a (presumably) 3-lane M1 to a (presumably) 2-lane A1, rather than making the slip roads 2-lane as you'd get at any motorway junction nowdays. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Underwood wrote:
Interesting that the junction was constructed with single-lane slip roads leading from a (presumably) 3-lane M1 to a (presumably) 2-lane A1, rather than making the slip roads 2-lane as you'd get at any motorway junction nowdays. But it wasn't built "nowadays". It was built at a time when the amount of traffic on the road, and especially the amount of long distance traffic, was so much less than now that a time traveller going back would think all drivers were having a non-driving protest day of some sort. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin Underwood" wrote in message s.com... ... Interesting that the junction was constructed with single-lane slip roads leading from a (presumably) 3-lane M1 to a (presumably) 2-lane A1, rather than making the slip roads 2-lane as you'd get at any motorway junction nowdays. South of the M10, the M1 used to be two-lane. In those days, most of the traffic used the M10 for access and it was possible (although unusual enough for me to remember it happening) to drive from London to Luton without seeing another vehicle travelling in the same direction. Colin Bignell |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Rowland" wrote in message ...
this expensive part of London without a reason. Has it seen any use since the M1 was extended? Yes. I used to climb through the fence from the nearby local road and cycle along there when I was a kid. It was great fun having a whole 2 lane half mile long piece of tarmac to yourself ![]() there about 18 years ago so god knows what state its in now. B2003 |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cast_Iron" wrote in message ... Martin Underwood wrote: Interesting that the junction was constructed with single-lane slip roads leading from a (presumably) 3-lane M1 to a (presumably) 2-lane A1, rather than making the slip roads 2-lane as you'd get at any motorway junction nowdays. But it wasn't built "nowadays". It was built at a time when the amount of traffic on the road, and especially the amount of long distance traffic, was so much less than now that a time traveller going back would think all drivers were having a non-driving protest day of some sort. Yes, but it was the point at which all the traffic coming south would have come off the M1 (assuming it hadn't come off at previous junctions, of course!) and I'm surprised that a single lane was judged to be sufficient even in the mid 60s, especially since it would have only taken one broken-down vehicle to close the exit entirely. Other slip roads on the M1 are all 2-lane - or have they been widened since they were originally built? I'll have to ask my dad: in the late 60s and early 70s he was regularly commuting from Leeds to West London each week, which must have been a nightmare before the Leeds-Sheffield bit was built. The article doesn't give any indication when that was built, except that it was some time after the M1 opened. I can remember the extension from Stourton (south Leeds) to central Leeds being built - probably early 70s. I hadn't realised that the extension south to Staples Corner was built as late as 1977. Whereabouts was the bit further south that was never built? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"nightjar" wrote in
: South of the M10, the M1 used to be two-lane. Only for two junctions, then three lanes again. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Wright" Overground wrote in message ... "nightjar" wrote in : South of the M10, the M1 used to be two-lane. Only for two junctions, then three lanes again. When it was built, it only went two junctions south of the M1/M10 interchange. Colin Bignell |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bus slip in Bow | London Transport | |||
Box Signal Box and Junction Road Junction | London Transport | |||
Piccadilly line slip-up | London Transport | |||
Withdrawal of Off Peak Inter-City services from Watford Junction to North West - Dec 2008 | London Transport | |||
Abandoned LU stations' travelcard zones? | London Transport |