Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Basil Jet
wrote: The DC service is presumably DC because it shares track with the Bakerloo, not because of any clearance issues. Did the adjacent tunnels have to be enlarged for the catenary? It was built as a DC route because it shared trains with the Bakerloo, decades before AC electrification came near Euston. It is quite possible that, since steam wasn't expected to use the lines, the tunnels were built to a tighter loading gauge. But I don't have data conveniently available to me. (You could do a FoIA request on the clearance.) -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Mobile: +44 7973 377646 | Web: http://www.davros.org Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Last class 378 goes 5 car | London Transport | |||
The vocabulary of a Class 378 | London Transport | |||
Class 378/2 at Haggerston | London Transport | |||
Class 378 in service | London Transport | |||
New platform markings for class 378 at Shepherd's Bush | London Transport |