Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() The new edition of Modern Railways shows that the footbridge being built at the soon-to-reopen station is covered. Is it a new standard that all footbridges have to be covered? Since the platforms appear to be mostly uncovered, in bad weather people will crowd on the footbridge while they are waiting for trains and then sprint down the stairs when the train arrives, so it seems dangerous as well as being an unnecessary expense if the bulk of the platforms are not going to be covered as well. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Basil Jet wrote:
The new edition of Modern Railways shows that the footbridge being built at the soon-to-reopen station is covered. Is it a new standard that all footbridges have to be covered? Since the platforms appear to be mostly uncovered, in bad weather people will crowd on the footbridge while they are waiting for trains and then sprint down the stairs when the train arrives, so it seems dangerous as well as being an unnecessary expense if the bulk of the platforms are not going to be covered as well. The footbridge linking platforms 1 and 2 at Shipley, West Yorkshire, built some time ago, is uncovered, and wasn't covered over when lifts connected to it were installed a few years ago. But the newer bridge linking platforms 3 and 4, built at the same time as the lift installation, is covered. So perhaps you are right about this being a new standard. -- Jeremy Double |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
re-opened station. I don't assume that. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/02/2016 22:49, Basil Jet wrote:
The new edition of Modern Railways shows that the footbridge being built at the soon-to-reopen station is covered. Is it a new standard that all footbridges have to be covered? Since the platforms appear to be mostly uncovered, in bad weather people will crowd on the footbridge while they are waiting for trains and then sprint down the stairs when the train arrives, so it seems dangerous as well as being an unnecessary expense if the bulk of the platforms are not going to be covered as well. I'd suspect that is to stop: People throwing themselves off People throwing objects off, or dangle things over Risks of slips when wet. Isn't one of issues on GWML that parapets on bridges now have to be even higher? I thought most HSE stuff had counter issues? We now protect children from so many risks, that they cannot properly evaluate such things as adults (or even as professionals in the field!) Jim (who fell out of trees and crashed bike into nettles as a child, and rock-climbed and driven a car on glazed ice as an adult!) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lea Bridge station opening 15th May 2016 | London Transport | |||
HST footbridge at Shepherd's Bush | London Transport | |||
Lea Bridge station reopening - meeting this Wednesday | London Transport |