Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 19:24:53 on Mon, 25 Apr
2016, tim... remarked: Unfortunately that looks like a Parking restriction, not a Waiting restriction. I don't think you can have a session-limited "No Waiting" sign. As no unattended parking is allowed by the Police, what's the difference between a Waiting and a Parking restriction? That's not a compulsory sign, though. And the whole problem is that the police *don't* enforce anything in practice. surely that's because it has been "devolved" to the council LAPE, but the things mentioned in the "Police" notice are not within their jurisdiction. I spent ten minutes there earlier today, and it's a toss-up between people who think that if they put on their hazard flashers it allows them to leave the vehicle unoccupied, or parked there for ten+ minutes occupied; and those who do both of those, but don't stick their hazard flashers on. -- Roland Perry |
#62
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#63
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 19:24:53 on Mon, 25 Apr 2016, tim... remarked: Unfortunately that looks like a Parking restriction, not a Waiting restriction. I don't think you can have a session-limited "No Waiting" sign. As no unattended parking is allowed by the Police, what's the difference between a Waiting and a Parking restriction? That's not a compulsory sign, though. And the whole problem is that the police *don't* enforce anything in practice. surely that's because it has been "devolved" to the council LAPE, but the things mentioned in the "Police" notice are not within their jurisdiction. I spent ten minutes there earlier today, and it's a toss-up between people who think that if they put on their hazard flashers it allows them to leave the vehicle unoccupied, or parked there for ten+ minutes occupied; and those who do both of those, but don't stick their hazard flashers on. The police are a lot more fierce about moving cars along in the Heathrow drop off lanes. It's now much harder for mini cabs to pick up their booked fares from those lanes than in the past. |
#65
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25/04/2016 14:18, David Cantrell wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 06:13:47PM +0100, JNugent wrote: There's always been a good case for the advance booking period for a so-called "private hire car" to be at least twenty-four hours. No there hasn't. Imagine, for example, that you are in an industrial estate in Peckham. There are no black cabs cruising the industrial estate looking for passengers. How do you get home? By calling a cab on the telephone? |
#66
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25/04/2016 14:18, David Cantrell wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 06:13:47PM +0100, JNugent wrote: There's always been a good case for the advance booking period for a so-called "private hire car" to be at least twenty-four hours. No there hasn't. Imagine, for example, that you are in an industrial estate in Peckham. There are no black cabs cruising the industrial estate looking for passengers. How do you get home? The whole reason why unlicensed* "private hire cars" (so-called) can operate with their unlicensed* drivers is a loophole in the law which distinguishes immediate hirings from advance bookings. Immediate hirings - taxis. Advance bookings - taxis (of course) *or* "private hire cars". But unless a significant minimum period for that advance booking is established and enforced, in practice, the law prohibiting unlicensed plying-for-hire cannot be operated properly. [* "licensed" here means licensed as a taxi or as a taxi-driver.] |
#67
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#68
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
receives a phone call from her son's school. He's had a serious accident and needs to be taken to a doctor and then probably home. Obviously the mother needs to get to the school as quickly as possible. Neither bus nor train will get the job done so she needs a cab. She's in the suburbs where black cabs are rarely found, so a minicab is the obvious mode of transport. Our black cab propagandist wants her to wait 24 hours. I make no comment. |
#69
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
-septe mber.org, at 21:08:12 on Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Recliner remarked: The police are a lot more fierce about moving cars along in the Heathrow drop off lanes. It's now much harder for mini cabs to pick up their booked fares from those lanes than in the past. Not just that, but there's heaps of signage that makes it very clear that the lanes are *drop off only* and that for pickup people should use the short stay carparks. Perhaps if someone were to drive a car bomb into a Glasgow station, rather than their airport terminal, things might change. -- Roland Perry |
#70
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 17:59:12 on Mon, 25
Apr 2016, Robin9 remarked: Boris Johnson introduced a one-strike-and-you're-out policy regarding private hire drivers touting for business. If they are caught doing it, they lose their private hire license which means no licensed cab firm can give them work. But the Uber drivers are mainly self-employed. -- Roland Perry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Taxu demos at KXStP | London Transport |