Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/05/16 10:23, Tim Watts wrote:
On 05/05/16 10:18, Clive Page wrote: On 05/05/2016 09:14, d wrote: I agree, it seems impossible to not notice. Shouldn't drivers who miss signs such as this be required to take another driving test (which I understand now includes an element that tests one's ability to notice hazards on the road) and also an eyesight test before being allowed to continue? Just the knowledge that this would be the result of a bridge bash might be enough to make drivers of high vehicles just a little bit more careful. No - 6 points on license. That would soon stop their carefree attitude and propensity to buy cheap non-truck grade GPS satnavs. No 11 points on license. That really would make them think. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Yet another new foot/cycle Thames bridge planned | London Transport | |||
another derailment | London Transport | |||
Shepherd's Bush on the Central Line - another platform? | London Transport | |||
Another Oyster Question | London Transport | |||
Another "Crapita" CC screw up | London Transport |