On 01/07/16 09:31, d wrote:
Well hopefully once the law is re-adjusted and we no longer have to cowtow to
that ****ing human rights act

Which parts of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights would you be
happy not to apply to yourself?

Ian

On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 09:52:29 +0100
The Real Doctor wrote:
On 01/07/16 09:31, d wrote:
Well hopefully once the law is re-adjusted and we no longer have to cowtow to
that ****ing human rights act

Which parts of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights would you be
happy not to apply to yourself?

If I illegally entered another country and commited a crime I wouldn't expect
to be able use my family as an excuse to stay, nor would I expect a load of
made up rubbish about what would happen if I got sent back have any weight
in any deporation decision either.

--
Spud

On 01/07/16 10:28, d wrote:
If I illegally entered another country and commited a crime I wouldn't expect
to be able use my family as an excuse to stay, nor would I expect a load of
made up rubbish about what would happen if I got sent back have any weight
in any deporation decision either.

What makes you think that any of that happens now?

Ian

On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:57:30 +0200
Wolfgang Schwanke wrote:
wrote in :

On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 09:52:29 +0100
The Real Doctor wrote:
On 01/07/16 09:31, d wrote:
Well hopefully once the law is re-adjusted and we no longer have to
cowtow to that ****ing human rights act

Which parts of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights would you be
happy not to apply to yourself?

If I illegally entered another country and commited a crime I wouldn't
expect to be able use my family as an excuse to stay, nor would I
expect a load of made up rubbish about what would happen if I got sent
back have any weight in any deporation decision either.

None of that is a human right though.

Article 8 has been used more than a few times to prevent deportations.

--
Spud

"Wolfgang Schwanke" wrote in message
...
d wrote in :

On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 09:52:29 +0100
The Real Doctor wrote:
On 01/07/16 09:31, d wrote:
Well hopefully once the law is re-adjusted and we no longer have to
cowtow to that ****ing human rights act

Which parts of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights would you be
happy not to apply to yourself?

If I illegally entered another country and commited a crime I wouldn't
expect to be able use my family as an excuse to stay, nor would I
expect a load of made up rubbish about what would happen if I got sent
back have any weight in any deporation decision either.

None of that is a human right though.

you will be surprised, very surprised

tim

wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 18:15:45 +0200
Wolfgang Schwanke wrote:
Roland Perry
wrote in news
In message , at 17:13:39 on Thu, 30 Jun
2016, Wolfgang Schwanke remarked:

Now that the entire population of the Middle East are no longer moving
to London

Brexit has no effect on migration from outside the EU.

It does, because it affects how many of the people camped at Sangette
(who are non-EU) get to the UK

They are illegal on both sides of the Channel already, and the UK has
its own immigration controls in place already. Brexit won't change
anything there. Something else is apparently not working, that won't be
fixed by leaving the EU.

Well hopefully once the law is re-adjusted and we no longer have to cowtow to
that ****ing human rights act then once these illegals are found they can be
booted out ASAP instead of parasite lawyers dragging the process out for years
with some variation on right to family life or BS a`bout being tortured if
they're sent back.

The recent vote was to leave the EU, not the European Convention on Human
Rights, which is separate from the EU...

See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro...n_Human_Rights
--
Jeremy Double

On 1 Jul 2016 16:42:24 GMT
Jeremy Double wrote:
wrote:
Well hopefully once the law is re-adjusted and we no longer have to cowtow to
that ****ing human rights act then once these illegals are found they can be
booted out ASAP instead of parasite lawyers dragging the process out for
years
with some variation on right to family life or BS a`bout being tortured if
they're sent back.

The recent vote was to leave the EU, not the European Convention on Human
Rights, which is separate from the EU...

See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro...n_Human_Rights

To be part of the EU you have to uphold said convention. Now we're leaving
that no longer applies.

--
Spud

In message , at 11:52:09 on Sat, 2 Jul
2016, d remarked:
The recent vote was to leave the EU, not the European Convention on Human
Rights, which is separate from the EU...

See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro...n_Human_Rights

To be part of the EU you have to uphold said convention. Now we're leaving
that no longer applies.

Wrong. It applies as long as we are members of the Council of Europe. A
completely different body.
--
Roland Perry

"Wolfgang Schwanke" wrote in message
...
Roland Perry
wrote in news
In message , at 17:13:39 on Thu, 30 Jun
2016, Wolfgang Schwanke remarked:

Now that the entire population of the Middle East are no longer moving
to London

Brexit has no effect on migration from outside the EU.

It does, because it affects how many of the people camped at Sangette
(who are non-EU) get to the UK

They are illegal on both sides of the Channel already, and the UK has
its own immigration controls in place already. Brexit won't change
anything there. Something else is apparently not working, that won't be
fixed by leaving the EU.

agreed

but almost no-one voted to Leave because they thought it might solve the
problem of the camps at Calais.

tim

In message , at 09:58:59 on Fri, 1 Jul 2016,
tim... remarked:
They are illegal on both sides of the Channel already, and the UK has
its own immigration controls in place already. Brexit won't change
anything there. Something else is apparently not working, that won't be
fixed by leaving the EU.

agreed

but almost no-one voted to Leave because they thought it might solve
the problem of the camps at Calais.

So Farage's infamous poster had no effect at all? What a waste of his
money.
--
Roland Perry