On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:00:27 +0100
Graeme Wall wrote:
On 01/07/2016 10:47, The Real Doctor wrote:
On 01/07/16 10:28, d wrote:
If I illegally entered another country and commited a crime I wouldn't
expect
to be able use my family as an excuse to stay, nor would I expect a
load of
made up rubbish about what would happen if I got sent back have any
weight
in any deporation decision either.

What makes you think that any of that happens now?


He read it in the Sun…

I assume the pair of you can use google?

--
Spud

On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:57:30 +0200
Wolfgang Schwanke wrote:
wrote in :

On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 09:52:29 +0100
The Real Doctor wrote:
On 01/07/16 09:31, d wrote:
Well hopefully once the law is re-adjusted and we no longer have to
cowtow to that ****ing human rights act

Which parts of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights would you be
happy not to apply to yourself?

If I illegally entered another country and commited a crime I wouldn't
expect to be able use my family as an excuse to stay, nor would I
expect a load of made up rubbish about what would happen if I got sent
back have any weight in any deporation decision either.

None of that is a human right though.

Article 8 has been used more than a few times to prevent deportations.

--
Spud

"Roland Perry" wrote in message
...
In message , at 09:58:59 on Fri, 1 Jul 2016,
tim... remarked:
They are illegal on both sides of the Channel already, and the UK has
its own immigration controls in place already. Brexit won't change
anything there. Something else is apparently not working, that won't be
fixed by leaving the EU.

agreed

but almost no-one voted to Leave because they thought it might solve the
problem of the camps at Calais.

So Farage's infamous poster had no effect at all? What a waste of his
money.

Which of Farage's posters said "Vote leave and the queues of people trying
to *illegally* enter Britain will disappear?"

Brexit is all about legal immigrants, the people queuing up at Calais are
illegals

tim

"Wolfgang Schwanke" wrote in message
...
d wrote in :

On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 09:52:29 +0100
The Real Doctor wrote:
On 01/07/16 09:31, d wrote:
Well hopefully once the law is re-adjusted and we no longer have to
cowtow to that ****ing human rights act

Which parts of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights would you be
happy not to apply to yourself?

If I illegally entered another country and commited a crime I wouldn't
expect to be able use my family as an excuse to stay, nor would I
expect a load of made up rubbish about what would happen if I got sent
back have any weight in any deporation decision either.

None of that is a human right though.

you will be surprised, very surprised

tim

In message , at 14:27:14 on Fri, 1 Jul 2016,
tim... remarked:
So Farage's infamous poster had no effect at all? What a waste of his
money.

Which of Farage's posters said "Vote leave and the queues of people
trying to *illegally* enter Britain will disappear?"

The one you claimed not to have seen.

Brexit is all about legal immigrants, the people queuing up at Calais
are illegals

Er, no. Brexit is also about (or so the leave voters were told) reducing
legal immigrants, as well as being able to come down harder on illegal
immigrants.
--
Roland Perry

On 01/07/16 11:00, Graeme Wall wrote:
He read it in the Sun…

"Read"?

Ian

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 04:31:41PM +0100, Roland Perry wrote:

It does, because it affects how many of the people camped at Sangette
(who are non-EU) get to the UK, and even whether the Sangette camp will
eventually be relocated to somewhere on the Kent coast.

The reason that it's in Calais is that the people there want to be close
to the UK so as to make it easier to get to the UK.

In the hypothetical situation of the French just opening the gates and
letting them through, there would be no reason for them to want to stay
in Kent. And our government has a policy of dispersing migrants around
the country and not just requiring that they stay next to the port they
entered through.

It is therefore clear that any suggestion of "the jungle" being
replicated in Kent is, to be blunt, ********, unless it is populated by
British people desperate to flee to France.

--
David Cantrell | even more awesome than a panda-fur coat

Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt

Wolfgang Schwanke wrote:
"tim..."
wrote in :

Which of Farage's posters said "Vote leave and the queues of people
trying to *illegally* enter Britain will disappear?"

https://metrouk2.files.wordpress.com...8&h=498&crop=1

Brexit is all about legal immigrants,

Those would be from other EU countries.
Most of the people on the poster have brown skin and black hair,
some oriental faces among them, and someone wearing a fez or a turban.

They were mainly Syrian refugees crossing from Croatia into Slovenia,
hoping to get to Germany. With or without Brexit, they would not be allowed
to enter the UK.

On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 13:55:26 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote:
Wolfgang Schwanke wrote:
Those would be from other EU countries.
Most of the people on the poster have brown skin and black hair,
some oriental faces among them, and someone wearing a fez or a turban.

They were mainly Syrian refugees crossing from Croatia into Slovenia,
hoping to get to Germany. With or without Brexit, they would not be allowed
to enter the UK.

Until they got an EU passport.

--
Spud

wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 13:55:26 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote:
Wolfgang Schwanke wrote:
Those would be from other EU countries.
Most of the people on the poster have brown skin and black hair,
some oriental faces among them, and someone wearing a fez or a turban.

They were mainly Syrian refugees crossing from Croatia into Slovenia,
hoping to get to Germany. With or without Brexit, they would not be allowed
to enter the UK.

Until they got an EU passport.

And how would they get one of those?