Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
TfL have released the following statement:
QUOTE Sadiq Khan has committed to a dramatic expansion of the Transport for London (TfL) team responsible for tackling touting and illegal activity affecting the Capital's taxi and private hire trades. As part of a concerted drive to improve customer safety, an extra 250 Compliance Officers will be recruited and deployed over the next year to patrol London's streets and crack down on illegal activity and improve safety. The Mayor's move quadruples the size of a team which provides a highly visible, uniformed presence in the West End, City and other areas across London. The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, said: 'I want Londoners to feel safe when they take a taxi or minicab and that is why I have approved a major increase to the size of our team that targets touts and illegal activities. It is the first part of a wider programme I will be introducing that will drive up standards in the industry and help our world famous cabbies continue to thrive.' Steve Burton, TfL's Director of Enforcement and On-Street Operations, said: 'Illegal minicab activity not only poses a serious risk to passenger safety but undermines licensed, law abiding taxi and private hire drivers. This welcome boost to our enforcement team provides Londoners with additional reassurance and also sends a message to those not complying with the law that they will be caught and dealt with robustly.' Steve McNamara, General Secretary of the Licensed Taxi Drivers Association, said: 'This is fantastic news for Londoners and the black cab trade; it is so refreshing to have a Mayor who recognises the danger posed to the travelling public by illegal minicab activity and is prepared to act to ensure their safety. We welcome this substantial increase in compliance officers, and look forward to working with Sadiq in the future.' The new officers will be funded through changes to private hire operator licensing so that larger firms pay a greater share of the costs of enforcement. TfL and its partners regularly carry out operations to deter and disrupt illegal minicab activity in the Capital and protect the public from touts. Operation Neon is a joint operation between TfL, the Metropolitan Police Service and Westminster City Council that takes place every weekend. An operation running between May 2015 and July 2016 has seen the following results: Operation Neon results: •127 Operations. •9699 private hire drivers advised and moved on to keep roads clear for taxis and booked private hire cabs. •448 private hire drivers were reported for not having a badge and were stopped from working for the remainder of the evening. •5116 private hire drivers were reported for not wearing their badge. •65 private hire drivers reported for plying for hire offences. •1265 private hire drivers reported for parking on taxi ranks. •2916 Parking tickets issued. Today's announcement is the first part of a comprehensive strategy overseen by the Mayor that will herald in a new era for the Capital's taxi and private hire trades. It will deliver radical improvements for customers, a boost to safety, support for the taxi trade and further improve the quality of service offered by the private hire trade. There will also be a concerted effort to make the Capital's taxi fleet the greenest in the world. UNQUOTE I'm not sure how public safety is increased by giving private hire drivers parking tickets, and I suspect most people using minicabs don't care if the driver is not displaying his badge. It will be interesting to see if the new mayor will have any really constructive ideas in his "wider programme." |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 04/08/2016 13:54, Robin9 wrote:
TfL have released the following statement: QUOTE Sadiq Khan has committed to a dramatic expansion of the Transport for London (TfL) team responsible for tackling touting and illegal activity affecting the Capital's taxi and private hire trades. The new officers will be funded through changes to private hire operator licensing so that larger firms pay a greater share of the costs of enforcement. TfL and its partners regularly carry out operations to deter and disrupt illegal minicab activity in the Capital and protect the public from touts. Operation Neon is a joint operation between TfL, the Metropolitan Police Service and Westminster City Council that takes place every weekend. An operation running between May 2015 and July 2016 has seen the following results: Operation Neon results: •127 Operations. •9699 private hire drivers advised and moved on to keep roads clear for taxis and booked private hire cabs. •448 private hire drivers were reported for not having a badge and were stopped from working for the remainder of the evening. •5116 private hire drivers were reported for not wearing their badge. •65 private hire drivers reported for plying for hire offences. •1265 private hire drivers reported for parking on taxi ranks. •2916 Parking tickets issued. Were no black cab drivers picked up on any infringments (however small) or is Operation Neon solely targeted at the private hire trade? I'm not sure how public safety is increased by giving private hire drivers parking tickets, and I suspect most people using minicabs don't care if the driver is not displaying his badge. It will be interesting to see if the new mayor will have any really constructive ideas in his "wider programme." Indeed - and in particular with Uber you know who the driver is from the app and can recognise them from their photo. Uber also track their drivers activity and it's very easy to complain about them if they do the wrong thing - something that's nowhere near as easy with conventional private hire companies and/or black cab drivers (if a black cab driver takes a circuitous route, what's your come back when the only person to complain to is the driver themselves and there's an absence of proof of the route followed) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
involved. The mayor is, of course, a professional politician. For some reason I've never understood, it seems politicians feel it's both respectable and legitimate to regard minicab drivers with open suspicion and dislike. This is particularly true of pseudo-liberal politicians who make a great song and dance about opposing prejudice. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 11:29:02 on
Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Paul Corfield remarked: There are "bad apples" in every trade but the inability to control the private hire industry expansion is causing considerable problems and not just for black cabs. Yes, the 95% of bad apples in the minicab business give the other 5% a bad name ![]() -- Roland Perry |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robin9 wrote:
Someone Somewhere;157370 Wrote: Were no black cab drivers picked up on any infringments (however small) or is Operation Neon solely targeted at the private hire trade? - I'm not sure how public safety is increased by giving private hire drivers parking tickets, and I suspect most people using minicabs don't care if the driver is not displaying his badge. It will be interesting to see if the new mayor will have any really constructive ideas in his "wider programme." - Indeed - and in particular with Uber you know who the driver is from the app and can recognise them from their photo. Uber also track their drivers activity and it's very easy to complain about them if they do the wrong thing - something that's nowhere near as easy with conventional private hire companies and/or black cab drivers (if a black cab driver takes a circuitous route, what's your come back when the only person to complain to is the driver themselves and there's an absence of proof of the route followed) According to the "statement" only private hire drivers were involved. The mayor is, of course, a professional politician. For some reason I've never understood, it seems politicians feel it's both respectable and legitimate to regard minicab drivers with open suspicion and dislike. This is particularly true of pseudo-liberal politicians who make a great song and dance about opposing prejudice.[/i][/color] I think the true motivation becomes clear if you read it as minicab = Uber. Robin |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Mayor and TfL do not have the powers to limit the number of new minicab drivers is completely fraudulent. The Bill passed by Tony Blair's government which imposed licencing upon London's private hire trade made TfL the regulatory body and gave them the authority to set standards and to create competence tests, including a "knowledge" test. The larger private hire firms took fright at this because they recognised that even a very moderate knowledge test would cut off their constant supply of new drivers. They lobbied TfL that they, out of the goodness of their public-minded hearts, should do the testing themselves and would set a realistically high standard, relevant to the day-to-day work of minicab drivers. To the eternal discredit of both the Mayor and TfL, this absurd proposal was accepted and TfL washed their hands of the matter. As any fool could have predicted, the private hire firms passed everyone who wanted to be a minicab driver and the number of private hire drivers in London increased enormously. To distract attention away from his and TfL's gross negligence in allowing this situation to arise, Boris Johnson put out impropaganda (1) to the effect his hands were tied and he needed special extra powers to restrict the number of new entrants to the trade. All that needs to be done is for TfL to take back the testing, to set the most undemanding of tests and the number of new entrants will collapse. It should be remembered that most new applicants to be minicab drivers in London are either Asians or immigrants who don't know Kings Cross from Charing Cross or London Bridge from Waterloo Bridge and who are totally convinced that all they need is a sat-nav. Demand that they learn how to get to Victoria Coach Station and the Royal Albert Hall and their enthusiasm will soon evaporate. (1) I regret to admit I did not invent this splendid word. There was, and perhaps still is, a company in Kentish Town, trading under that name. Last edited by Robin9 : August 11th 16 at 06:32 PM |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "bob" wrote in message ... Robin9 wrote: Someone Somewhere;157370 Wrote: Were no black cab drivers picked up on any infringments (however small) or is Operation Neon solely targeted at the private hire trade? - I'm not sure how public safety is increased by giving private hire drivers parking tickets, and I suspect most people using minicabs don't care if the driver is not displaying his badge. It will be interesting to see if the new mayor will have any really constructive ideas in his "wider programme." - Indeed - and in particular with Uber you know who the driver is from the app and can recognise them from their photo. Uber also track their drivers activity and it's very easy to complain about them if they do the wrong thing - something that's nowhere near as easy with conventional private hire companies and/or black cab drivers (if a black cab driver takes a circuitous route, what's your come back when the only person to complain to is the driver themselves and there's an absence of proof of the route followed) According to the "statement" only private hire drivers were involved. The mayor is, of course, a professional politician. For some reason I've never understood, it seems politicians feel it's both respectable and legitimate to regard minicab drivers with open suspicion and dislike. This is particularly true of pseudo-liberal politicians who make a great song and dance about opposing prejudice. I think the true motivation becomes clear if you read it as minicab = Uber.[/i][/color] I've said it before, and I'm saying it again if TPTB want to clamp down on Uber they should be doing so by enforcing the disabled regulation on them properly. There are dozens of stories of their drivers not complying. tim |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robin9" wrote in message ... tim...;157390 Wrote: "bob" wrote in message ...- Robin9 wrote:- Someone Somewhere;157370 Wrote:- - Were no black cab drivers picked up on any infringments (however small) or is Operation Neon solely targeted at the private hire trade? - I'm not sure how public safety is increased by giving private hire drivers parking tickets, and I suspect most people using minicabs don't care if the driver is not displaying his badge. It will be interesting to see if the new mayor will have any really constructive ideas in his "wider programme." - Indeed - and in particular with Uber you know who the driver is from the app and can recognise them from their photo. Uber also track their drivers activity and it's very easy to complain about them if they do the wrong thing - something that's nowhere near as easy with conventional private hire companies and/or black cab drivers (if a black cab driver takes a circuitous route, what's your come back when the only person to complain to is the driver themselves and there's an absence of proof of the route followed)- According to the "statement" only private hire drivers were involved. The mayor is, of course, a professional politician. For some reason I've never understood, it seems politicians feel it's both respectable and legitimate to regard minicab drivers with open suspicion and dislike. This is particularly true of pseudo-liberal politicians who make a great song and dance about opposing prejudice.- I think the true motivation becomes clear if you read it as minicab = Uber. I've said it before, and I'm saying it again if TPTB want to clamp down on Uber they should be doing so by enforcing the disabled regulation on them properly. There are dozens of stories of their drivers not complying. tim Which disabled regulation are you referring to?[/i][/color] The one that requires them to provide an "equal" service to disabled passengers. It is generic legislation, not specific to taxi drivers Private hire drivers are not taxi drivers. They still have to comply Therefore the various obligations imposed on taxi drivers do not apply to private hire (minicab) drivers. Obviously private hire drivers, like everyone else, must obey the law, including the several laws against discrimination, but unlike taxi drivers, they have no greater duties and obligations than anyone else. They have the duties and obligations of a "business", these are significantly greater than the duties of a private individual (who can, of course, freely decide not to let a guide dog in their car when offering a blind person a lift) tim |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sadiq Khan and the Central Line | London Transport | |||
Sadiq Khan to review Tube ticket office closures | London Transport | |||
Sadiq Khan and TfL on taxis and minicabs | London Transport | |||
TFL and minicabs. | London Transport | |||
Taxis and the congestion charge | London Transport |