Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:46:07 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote: wrote: The whole point of the project eludes me frankly. It won't be used as a route into central london - people will just get the quicker overground to euston instead. There may be some demand for commuter traffic from watford to various western points on the met but nowhere near enough to justify the cost. If the point is simply to have a tube line at watford junction then surely re-extending the bakerloo would be far quicker and cheaper. I think the local interest is more about serving the two new stations, connecting them both to the Junction and LU. There will also be some traffic from Met stations to the Junction. As for traffic from the Junction A lot of money just for that tbh. to Euston, surely the much faster LM services are far more popular than the slow, stopping LO? Don't know. I guess it depends how frequent they are compared to the overground. Also I'm sure a lot of people change onto the bakerloo instead of going all the way to euston. I never really got the rationalle behind cutting the bakerloo back to harrow. There's obviously a commuter demand for it (hence LO) and it wasn't even the longest tube line when it did run there so its not as if it was going miles. -- Spud |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
London Metropolitan line Watford | London Transport | |||
New Connection Watford Triangle - Metropolitan Line | London Transport | |||
Metropolitan Line | London Transport | |||
Metropolitan Line Extension | London Transport | |||
Metropolitan Line Questions | London Transport |