Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
-septe mber.org, at 10:35:45 on Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Recliner remarked: It's the 737-700ER, with a range of 5,630 nm. That's enough to get from London to anywhere in the continental US. Not I suspect if you include fuel safety margins. Perhaps the range has haht factored in, otherwise it's pretty meaningless. No, they always quote the range like that. Like what - with a typical safety margin included, or without? Furthermore, it's usually the max fuel, rather than max payload, range that's quoted. It's a bit like the usually hopelessly optimistic ranges quoted for EVs or fuel consumption/pollution for IC-engined cars. -- Roland Perry |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
City Hall NYC - stunning photos | London Transport | |||
"Jet and Turkish Airlines 777 in 'near-miss' over London" | London Transport | |||
NYC and London: Comparisons. | London Transport | |||
Chesham City trains doomed | London Transport | |||
I've been to London for business meetings and told myself that I'd be back to see London for myself. (rather than flying one day and out the next) I've used the tube briefly and my questions a | London Transport |