Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
https://50skyshades.com/news/business-aviation/bliss-jet-to-launch-laguardia-to-london-private-jet-service-in-january
This looks like the next dead cert failure. A genuinely private business jet that flies when and where you want it to is one thing, but a shared, scheduled weekly service in a small, cramped business jet to Stansted is another, particularly at higher than first class fares. Someone wanting to fly in comfort from NYC to Canary Wharf or the City would be much better off flying on BA's daily direct flight from London City airport. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article you write:
https://50skyshades.com/news/business-aviation/bliss-jet-to-launch-laguardia-to-london-private-jet-service-in-january This looks like the next dead cert failure. This looks like vapourware. It says the New York end of the flights will be at the Marine Air Terminal at LaGuardia airport, correctly noting that it's considerably closer to midtown Manhattan than either JFK or Newark. But LaGuardia is a domestic airport. It has no customs or immigration facilities and its only international flights are from Canada, where flights are precleared. It seems rather unlikely that the US would set up a preclearance station at Stansted. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Levine wrote:
In article you write: https://50skyshades.com/news/business-aviation/bliss-jet-to-launch-laguardia-to-london-private-jet-service-in-january This looks like the next dead cert failure. This looks like vapourware. It says the New York end of the flights will be at the Marine Air Terminal at LaGuardia airport, correctly noting that it's considerably closer to midtown Manhattan than either JFK or Newark. But LaGuardia is a domestic airport. It has no customs or immigration facilities and its only international flights are from Canada, where flights are precleared. It seems rather unlikely that the US would set up a preclearance station at Stansted. I wondered if LGA's executive jet FBO could be used? http://www.talonairjets.com/laguardi...te-jet-charter After all, the service will be using executive jets. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
https://50skyshades.com/news/business-aviation/bliss-jet-to-launch-laguardia-to-london-private-jet-service-in-january
This looks like the next dead cert failure. This looks like vapourware. It says the New York end of the flights will be at the Marine Air Terminal at LaGuardia airport, correctly noting that it's considerably closer to midtown Manhattan than either JFK or Newark. But LaGuardia is a domestic airport. It has no customs or immigration facilities and its only international flights are from Canada, where flights are precleared. It seems rather unlikely that the US would set up a preclearance station at Stansted. I wondered if LGA's executive jet FBO could be used? http://www.talonairjets.com/laguardi...te-jet-charter It said the Marine Air Terminal, which is the original airport building, used by flying boats taking off and landing on the water, with fabulous art deco details. It's had its ups and downs but was extensively refurbished about 20 years ago. It's currently used for the Delta shuttle and for private jets. Finding a place for two biz jets a week is not the problem, the problem is that there's nobody to clear incoming passengers through customs and immigration when they arrive. I suppose that for two flights a week with a dozen people they could pay to have some customs staff come up from JFK for an hour or so, but the whole thing seems dodgy. R's, John |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Levine wrote:
https://50skyshades.com/news/business-aviation/bliss-jet-to-launch-laguardia-to-london-private-jet-service-in-january This looks like the next dead cert failure. This looks like vapourware. It says the New York end of the flights will be at the Marine Air Terminal at LaGuardia airport, correctly noting that it's considerably closer to midtown Manhattan than either JFK or Newark. But LaGuardia is a domestic airport. It has no customs or immigration facilities and its only international flights are from Canada, where flights are precleared. It seems rather unlikely that the US would set up a preclearance station at Stansted. I wondered if LGA's executive jet FBO could be used? http://www.talonairjets.com/laguardi...te-jet-charter It said the Marine Air Terminal, which is the original airport building, used by flying boats taking off and landing on the water, with fabulous art deco details. It's had its ups and downs but was extensively refurbished about 20 years ago. It's currently used for the Delta shuttle and for private jets. Finding a place for two biz jets a week is not the problem, the problem is that there's nobody to clear incoming passengers through customs and immigration when they arrive. I suppose that for two flights a week with a dozen people they could pay to have some customs staff come up from JFK for an hour or so, but the whole thing seems dodgy. Presumably they'll use whatever arrangement is currently used with other private jets, which already use LGA for long haul flights. I notice their announcement mentions that customers will "Proceed rapidly through customs". |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 19:58:54 on Tue, 17 Jan
2017, John Levine remarked: https://50skyshades.com/news/business-aviation/bliss-jet-to-launch-laguardia-to-london-private-jet-service-in-january This looks like the next dead cert failure. This looks like vapourware. It says the New York end of the flights will be at the Marine Air Terminal at LaGuardia airport, correctly noting that it's considerably closer to midtown Manhattan than either JFK or Newark. But LaGuardia is a domestic airport. It has no customs or immigration facilities and its only international flights are from Canada, where flights are precleared. It seems rather unlikely that the US would set up a preclearance station at Stansted. Does it say the flights are non-stop? Perhaps they'll clear customs/immigration en-route, as BA does at Shannon for its flights from London City Airport. As for the business model - perhaps they have one (or two) customers who have commissioned a regular trip, and this is a way of selling a few more seats on the plane? -- Roland Perry |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 19:58:54 on Tue, 17 Jan 2017, John Levine remarked: https://50skyshades.com/news/business-aviation/bliss-jet-to-launch-laguardia-to-london-private-jet-service-in-january This looks like the next dead cert failure. This looks like vapourware. It says the New York end of the flights will be at the Marine Air Terminal at LaGuardia airport, correctly noting that it's considerably closer to midtown Manhattan than either JFK or Newark. But LaGuardia is a domestic airport. It has no customs or immigration facilities and its only international flights are from Canada, where flights are precleared. It seems rather unlikely that the US would set up a preclearance station at Stansted. Does it say the flights are non-stop? I'm pretty sure they're non-stop. Perhaps they'll clear customs/immigration en-route, as BA does at Shannon for its flights from London City Airport. No need. LGA already handles long haul business jets, providing customs and immigration facilities, just as are available at many other small airports used by private jets. Just because they aren't provided for larger commercial jets doesn't stop them being available for small business jets carrying a handful of people, whose identities will already have been notified. Presumably they have to be pre-booked, to ensure that the staff are available. For example, I don't think the Harrods terminal at Luton is busy enough to have full-time customs and immigration staff, but they come over when needed. Also, many private jet flights are not physically checked. Like boats, they notify customs, but if the passengers say they have nothing to declare, customs may choose to accept their declaration without physically being present, just as most pax going through the green channel aren't stopped. Presumably they need, at most, one immigration officer, but perhaps even that may not be needed. As for the business model - perhaps they have one (or two) customers who have commissioned a regular trip, and this is a way of selling a few more seats on the plane? Unlikely, I'd have thought. Surely regular passengers would rather fly first class from Heathrow, or on the existing LCY JFK flights? And people who routinely use business jets won't want to share them with strangers. A packed business jet will be less comfortable than a commercial flight. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
-septe mber.org, at 10:02:07 on Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Recliner remarked: As for the business model - perhaps they have one (or two) customers who have commissioned a regular trip, and this is a way of selling a few more seats on the plane? Unlikely, I'd have thought. Surely regular passengers would rather fly first class from Heathrow, or on the existing LCY JFK flights? And people who routinely use business jets won't want to share them with strangers. One of their USPs is reducing the "overhead" time at the airports both ends (and the NY end being closer to Manhattan). There's a lot of US-focussed hi-tech companies in the Cambridge area. A packed business jet will be less comfortable than a commercial flight. I expect the clients will be sufficiently comfortable in the business jet. -- Roland Perry |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Levine wrote:
In article you write: https://50skyshades.com/news/business-aviation/bliss-jet-to-launch-laguardia-to-london-private-jet-service-in-january This looks like the next dead cert failure. This looks like vapourware. It says the New York end of the flights will be at the Marine Air Terminal at LaGuardia airport, correctly noting that it's considerably closer to midtown Manhattan than either JFK or Newark. They also seem to be confused, advertising Westchester-Biggin Hill in June. http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/articl...w-york-service Does Westchester have customs and immigration? Oh sorry, Westchester and Stansted: http://media.wix.com/ugd/22fe6d_aa60...4d8325ba06.pdf Ooops, I mean La Guardia and Stansted: http://www.blissjet.com/where-we-fly Third time lucky? (links all from the Blissjet website) Theo |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:36:13 +0000, Roland Perry
wrote: In message -septe mber.org, at 10:02:07 on Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Recliner remarked: As for the business model - perhaps they have one (or two) customers who have commissioned a regular trip, and this is a way of selling a few more seats on the plane? Unlikely, I'd have thought. Surely regular passengers would rather fly first class from Heathrow, or on the existing LCY JFK flights? And people who routinely use business jets won't want to share them with strangers. One of their USPs is reducing the "overhead" time at the airports both ends (and the NY end being closer to Manhattan). Yes There's a lot of US-focussed hi-tech companies in the Cambridge area. True A packed business jet will be less comfortable than a commercial flight. I expect the clients will be sufficiently comfortable in the business jet. Not compared to the significantly cheaper first class seats on a commercial flight. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
City Hall NYC - stunning photos | London Transport | |||
"Jet and Turkish Airlines 777 in 'near-miss' over London" | London Transport | |||
NYC and London: Comparisons. | London Transport | |||
Chesham City trains doomed | London Transport | |||
I've been to London for business meetings and told myself that I'd be back to see London for myself. (rather than flying one day and out the next) I've used the tube briefly and my questions a | London Transport |