Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, 4 March 2017 10:24:50 UTC, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 08:27:21 on Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Matthew Dickinson remarked: No, you might get an unauthorised overdraft on your credit card, and quite likely a penalty charge from the card company. if you got these it wouldn't be rejected, would it? The two outcomes are mutually exclusive. Not if the Card Company sends a flag back to TfL saying "that was at your risk because the customer is overdrawn". and what on earth does that mean? A transaction can be accepted in full, accepted at the retailer's risk, or refused completely. Any transaction is either authorised, or declined. The only case where the transaction is at the retailer's risk is if the retailer has overridden the prompt for an authorisation (a common example is using Visa Electron on-board trains and planes, where the card must always be authorised, and historically there has been no way to do so). That's the situation when the authorisation process simply isn't available. There's another scenario where (eg) in mail order the authorisation system says "sorry, wrong delivery address" and the retailer decides to ship it anyway. Or that's what I've always understood. -- Roland Perry On Saturday, 4 March 2017 10:24:50 UTC, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 08:27:21 on Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Matthew Dickinson remarked: No, you might get an unauthorised overdraft on your credit card, and quite likely a penalty charge from the card company. if you got these it wouldn't be rejected, would it? The two outcomes are mutually exclusive. Not if the Card Company sends a flag back to TfL saying "that was at your risk because the customer is overdrawn". and what on earth does that mean? A transaction can be accepted in full, accepted at the retailer's risk, or refused completely. Any transaction is either authorised, or declined. The only case where the transaction is at the retailer's risk is if the retailer has overridden the prompt for an authorisation (a common example is using Visa Electron on-board trains and planes, where the card must always be authorised, and historically there has been no way to do so). That's the situation when the authorisation process simply isn't available. There's another scenario where (eg) in mail order the authorisation system says "sorry, wrong delivery address" and the retailer decides to ship it anyway. Or that's what I've always understood. -- Roland Perry Even if address verification is used, any Customer Not Present transaction has the potential to be chargebacked. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster product pickup improvements | London Transport | |||
London Fares and Product Changes from 2nd January 2005 (LONG) | London Transport | |||
London Fares and Product Changes from 2nd January 2005 (LONG) | London Transport | |||
London Fares and Product Changes from 2nd January 2005 (LONG) | London Transport | |||
London Fares and Product Changes from 2nd January 2005 (LONG) | London Transport |