Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 00:19:02 +0000, Basil Jet
wrote: https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/tub.../consult_view/ Next week - Northern Line to Elstree ? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 02/03/2017 00:19, Basil Jet wrote:
https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/tub.../consult_view/ At last, a proposal that wasn't in the 1971 London Rail Study! Makes a lot of sense. -- Graeme Wall This account not read. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 02/03/2017 02:39, Charles Ellson wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 00:19:02 +0000, Basil Jet wrote: https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/tub.../consult_view/ Next week - Northern Line to Elstree ? Already there, you can see the trains on Eastenders… -- Graeme Wall This account not read. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Basil Jet" wrote in message news ![]() https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/tub.../consult_view/ get then to give Bromley council a great big kick up the arse and stop them from vetoing the extension along the Catford branch. I really can't believe that the residents of Hayes wouldn't prefer an every 5 minute service to a choice of central London destinations instead of a 15 minute service to a main line station where they have to change, just because they lose the possibility of through services to Cannon Street. and not to mention the possibility for a 24 hour service |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 02/03/2017 08:54, tim... wrote:
"Basil Jet" wrote in message news ![]() https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/tub.../consult_view/ get then to give Bromley council a great big kick up the arse and stop them from vetoing the extension along the Catford branch. I really can't believe that the residents of Hayes wouldn't prefer an every 5 minute service to a choice of central London destinations instead of a 15 minute service to a main line station where they have to change, just because they lose the possibility of through services to Cannon Street. and not to mention the possibility for a 24 hour service Presumably that comes under the heading of proposed extensions. -- Graeme Wall This account not read. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Graeme Wall" wrote in message news ![]() On 02/03/2017 08:54, tim... wrote: "Basil Jet" wrote in message news ![]() https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/tub.../consult_view/ get then to give Bromley council a great big kick up the arse and stop them from vetoing the extension along the Catford branch. I really can't believe that the residents of Hayes wouldn't prefer an every 5 minute service to a choice of central London destinations instead of a 15 minute service to a main line station where they have to change, just because they lose the possibility of through services to Cannon Street. and not to mention the possibility for a 24 hour service Presumably that comes under the heading of proposed extensions. it was in the original suggestion but was taken out because Bromley didn't support it (actively discouraged it) The additional costs of converting 5-10 miles of over-ground line is going to be (relatively) trivial and the costs of the linking tunnel is going to cost considerably more to do as a one-off, than as part of the original build and, of course, it saves on the costs of turn around facilities at Lewisham tim |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:21:15 -0000
"tim..." wrote: "Graeme Wall" wrote in message news ![]() On 02/03/2017 08:54, tim... wrote: "Basil Jet" wrote in message news ![]() https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/tub.../consult_view/ I'd lay money on the actual old kent road station ending up in the middle of the 2 proposals if this extension ever gets built. but was taken out because Bromley didn't support it (actively discouraged it) I can kind of see their point. Would you really want to switch to having to squeeze onto a tube train in the rush hour when up until now you've been used to mainline sized trains? Also tube trains arn't fast and the journey could end up taking somewhat longer. -- Spud |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message news ![]() On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:21:15 -0000 "tim..." wrote: "Graeme Wall" wrote in message news ![]() On 02/03/2017 08:54, tim... wrote: "Basil Jet" wrote in message news ![]() https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/tub.../consult_view/ I'd lay money on the actual old kent road station ending up in the middle of the 2 proposals if this extension ever gets built. but was taken out because Bromley didn't support it (actively discouraged it) I can kind of see their point. Would you really want to switch to having to squeeze onto a tube train in the rush hour when up until now you've been used to mainline sized trains? you really think there's that much of a difference? And there will be more of them (per hour) so more room for all the people at the outlying stations Also tube trains arn't fast and the journey could end up taking somewhat longer. The services are already "all stops" so I can't see it being that different tim -- Spud |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
London Bridge August 2016 to December 2017 | London Transport | |||
Back office Oystercard delayed until 2017 | London Transport | |||
West London Tram consultation | London Transport |