Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 04:55:39 +0100, Basil Jet
wrote: On 2017\07\14 18:45, Chris Date (CMPD) wrote: Managed to get out of the Friday morning meeting earlier with 30 mins to spare to get to Stratford for the daily Elizabeth Line unit working. I arrived on the Central Line at 10:41, it pulled in cross-platform at 10:42. Perfect timing! Photos: https://twitter.com/cmpd_date/status/885811382662438913 The nice driver(s) even let me take some photos in the cab at Shenfield: https://twitter.com/cmpd_date/status/885817575158009857 Overall, I give the train a 8/10, the interior décor is a bit too dark (too much grey) and the seats are more akin to the rock-hard Overground 378s rather than the comparatively softer LUL S Stock but otherwise well done to all involved. Thanks. The moquette is crap. The coats of arms of Greater London, City Of London, Essex, Berkshire and Buckinghamshire would have made more of a statement. Doubt this sort of detail is possible on moquette. It would be great to have the coats of arms somewhere on the trains. But, my preference would be Middlesex as opposed to Great London. Of greater concern is the longitudinal hard seating. Within my memory commuters from Twyford had compartment stock and conveniences on board. Progress NOT. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
e27002 aurora wrote:
Of greater concern is the longitudinal hard seating. Within my memory commuters from Twyford had compartment stock and conveniences on board. Progress NOT. Within rather more recent memory, Twyford was served by noisy rattly smelly and slow 1st Gen DMMUs, against which 345s will surely be an improvement. Also, presumably Telford will still be served by some gWr electrostar services? Anna Noyd-Dryver |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/07/2017 16:38, Anna Noyd-Dryver wrote:
e27002 aurora wrote: Of greater concern is the longitudinal hard seating. Within my memory commuters from Twyford had compartment stock and conveniences on board. Progress NOT. Within rather more recent memory, Twyford was served by noisy rattly smelly and slow 1st Gen DMMUs, against which 345s will surely be an improvement. Also, presumably Telford will still be served by some gWr electrostar services? Anna Noyd-Dryver Given to slow rate of progress for the many 1st gen DMUs a toilet was essential. I think the poster was referring to the way some trains were 'flighted' in that some Reading to PAD trains with Mk1 carriages stopped only at Twyford and then ran non stop with the next from Reading stopping at only Maidenhead. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anna Noyd-Dryver wrote:
e27002 aurora wrote: Of greater concern is the longitudinal hard seating. Within my memory commuters from Twyford had compartment stock and conveniences on board. Progress NOT. Within rather more recent memory, Twyford was served by noisy rattly smelly and slow 1st Gen DMMUs, against which 345s will surely be an improvement. Also, presumably Telford will still be served by some gWr electrostar services? Twyford, #obvs. Damn autocucumber again! Andy Hyde-Rover |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Chisholm wrote:
On 17/07/2017 16:38, Anna Noyd-Dryver wrote: e27002 aurora wrote: Of greater concern is the longitudinal hard seating. Within my memory commuters from Twyford had compartment stock and conveniences on board. Progress NOT. Within rather more recent memory, Twyford was served by noisy rattly smelly and slow 1st Gen DMMUs, against which 345s will surely be an improvement. Also, presumably Telford will still be served by some gWr electrostar services? Meaning Twyford, obviously! Given to slow rate of progress for the many 1st gen DMUs a toilet was essential. I think the poster was referring to the way some trains were 'flighted' in that some Reading to PAD trains with Mk1 carriages stopped only at Twyford and then ran non stop with the next from Reading stopping at only Maidenhead. That still occurs, to a certain extent, particularly in the down direction evening peak, but there are some up peak trains specifically to ease the lot of Twyford/Maidenhead commuters. Anna Noyd-Dryver |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I travelled on one of the new Elizabeth Line stock yesterday.
The seats are hard, uncomfortable and unpleasant; every bit as bad as those on the 700 series used by Thameslink. Why do TOCs specify hard seats? My journey was between Stratford and Liverpool Street. I feel sorry for anyone coming in from Shenfield or Maidenhead. On a more positive note, I do admire the interior layout of these trains: spacious and offering a choice of seating arrangement. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The real Elizabeth Line | London Transport | |||
Class 345 in service (Crossrail Elizabeth Line) | London Transport | |||
Looking for Irreverent Nickname for Elizabeth Line | London Transport | |||
Crossrail Elizabeth Line trainset unveiled | London Transport | |||
Crossrail Elizabeth Line trainset unveiled | London Transport |