Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since we are on the topic of comparing things stateside, I thought I'd
share my recent experiences of the NYC subway system during a recent stay. Stations: All stations I saw appeared litter free with no signs of vandalism, however it is probably fair to say every single one looked very dirty and smelt like a public toilet! Most of the stations I used did show signs of renovation work in progress although in a couple of cases this meant that platforms and passageways were open with surfaces potholed while they were in the process of relaying them. Also there were no staff to be seen inside the ticket barriers on most stations. I was very impressed by the extending platform edges on the curved platforms at South Ferry, but was not impressed by the fact that the rear 5 coaches (of 10) do not fit into the station and there is no passenger connection between units 5 and 6. Anyone who could not read the English posters might have difficulty there as the muffled announcement did not help, and the staff made no effort to detrain people in the wrong carrages at the previous station. I realised in time, but there were still people in my carrage as I left and legged it along the platform. The station is on a loop so anyone in the wrong carrages will just get returned to the previous station. One thing that caused me a great deal of confusion is that the stations often have seperate external entrances for each direction of travel, and no internal bridge/underpass if you enter via the wrong one. Sometimes these external entrances were a block apart with no signposting between them. I guess this is something you get used to, but as a first time visitor to a station it is baffling. Trains: About the same as the UK, less evidence of tagging on the trains compared to the UK however they had a far worse etching problem, probably down to some lines having everthing internal covered in stainless steel plating. The newer trains had dot-matrix screens and clear recorded announcements, just like the Jubilee and Northern lines. One line also had lights behind each station on the route maps above the windows which indicated the trains current position on the line. One thing missing on all lines was seat cushions, the moulded plastic seats quickly become uncomfortable. On most trains you could look out the front window (drivers cab is on one side) which was kind of cool to stand by for a near drivers eye view. Fair structu Much easier to understand than London, no zones, no local cross-boundary fares just a single $2 flat fare per journey (including a bus transfer as part of the same subway journey). Travelcard style unlimited use tickets were also available but I used the pre-pay MetroCard which I could buy or refill at each station. Also if you put $10 on your MetroCard it gave you another $2 journey for free. Passenger information: No tube maps posted on platforms (usually the only one is outside the gateline), no destination/time indicators on platforms, most announcements muffled and distorted (yes, much worse than London). Signs were of variable quality. Given that multiple destinations depart from the same platforms, and there are express/stopping varients of services this lack of info didn't help. The line number/letter is displayed on the front of each train and once on the side of each car with the terminus points to make up for this though. The dot matrix signs inside the newer stock were also a great help in understanding where the train was going. Reliability: Did not experience any major service disruption - just as I rarely do on my daily DLR journey. Overall I think that if I was offered reduced / flat fares NYC style but in return for their shoddy, dirty, smelly stations, lack of staff, lack of information and uncomfortable trains then I would turn it down. After all, given the current exchange rate, I'm not paying more then $4 a day for my Z1+2 annual. So everyone at LU reading this, give yourselves a big pat on the back. I have experienced a comparable system and the Underground is equal or far better in all aspects except for cost. But then I guess you get what you pay for. Of course I'm sure other people's experiences will be different. -- Gareth Davis |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
On attempts to modernise signalling in New York subway | London Transport | |||
[USA]Prohibition-era train steams onto New York subway for 1920s TV series | London Transport | |||
New York subway (was: London Free Rides) | London Transport | |||
New York subway (was: London Free Rides) | London Transport | |||
New York subway (was: London Free Rides) | London Transport |