Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Dave Arquati wrote:
Sky Fly wrote: Here's an idea I thought about to improve bus services in London. Instead of having all bus routes serve all bus stops in London, there would be a division of bus routes into 'local' and 'express' bus routes. I think mixed services as proposed in Tom Anderson's post would be very useful for inner London areas not served well by rail-based modes - for example Hackney, Camberwell, Chelsea. Such services could serve all stops until reaching a railhead, and then run fast from there I think there's a flaw in this idea: these buses have to make up for the lack of rail lines in those areas, and that means providing a fast inward service; running all-stops to the railhead is utterly wrongheaded. Think about it: the all-stops part would be no faster than catching a local, so why not just catch a local to the railhead and a train from there? Rather, the service has to run fast from the start to the railhead, along the lines of the tram-busting services i vaguely alluded to in the recent thread. The more i think about it, the more i think my express plan isn't very useful over this sort of scale. You either have to scale down the Metropolitan scheme uniformly (which would mean running fast into local centres - something like Northwold Road, Clapton, Linscott Road and then fast to Hackney Central, which frankly seems quite silly, as it's only a few minutes anyway), or maintain the scale and do something like Walthamstow Central, the Leyton stops, the Lea Bridge Road stops and then fast to Liverpool Street. The latter option might be useful, but i think the uniform wannabe-tube plan (stopping only at Walthamstow Central, Leyton, Clapton, Hackney, Shoreditch, Liverpool Street) would be better, as it puts a useful service in reach of more people (where 'in reach of' is basically not more than 10 minute's walk, which is about 500 m). Perhaps the one case it would be useful is in a very Metroland-like context, for example if you wanted to bring fast TfL connectivity to the borough of Havering; you could have a bus that went express to various points around Romford, and then busted it non-stop down to Liverpool Street. Or something. for example, a Camberwell service might run all stops to Elephant & Castle, and then London Bridge, City (say Monument station), Liverpool St. Hey, that could be the other end of my local route - it would follow the current route of the 48 from Walthamstow Central, all stops to Liverpool Street via Leyton, Clapton, Hackney and Shoreditch. Or maybe it'd be fast from Hackney (the first meaningful railway station). tom -- You are in a twisty maze of directories, all alike. In front of you is a broken pipe... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"Underground tickets will be accepted on local bus routes" | London Transport | |||
LT express bus from heathrow | London Transport | |||
Validity of Local Authority "Over 60s" free bus passes ? | London Transport | |||
Stansted Express Train - Express ride to a missed flight | London Transport | |||
Apology if Mad Bill Pal m er has been annoying members of uk.local.birmingham? | London Transport |