Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
..
Oh dear. You've made the classic mistake of people who plan these frequencies. What you are describing is a line. What we need is a network. As soon as your journey involves a change, 4 tph is inadequate on short-distance services. Even if both services are 4 tph, if you have a deadline you have to plan on a 15 minute delay at the connection - in a journey where you might only spend 15 minutes moving. This is not the way to compete with the car. Fair point. However my guess is that most people who catch a London-bound train at Eltham are either going to a destination within walking distance of London Bridge/Waterloo/Charing Cross/Cannon St or will continue their journey by tube. The number who need to think about a connection to eg Shepperton or Carshalton Beeches is probably fairly small. I don't have any figures to back this up but if I'm right, improving the line will be what most people need. My main point though is there seems to be a tendency among transport planners to give up on improving peak services to and from South-East London and to fob people off with more off-peak services. Extra off-peak services may be desirable (especially in the evening) but I don't think are the top priority. What's really needed in the short term is longer trains/platforms, in the medium term Thameslink 2000 and in the long term a new tube line. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boris: Crossrail not yet "signed, sealed and delivered" [was:Transport Secretary vows to finish Crossrail] | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport |