"Respect" are promising a £1 flat fare for tube use. They want *more* people
to use the tube.

I wonder if anyone in "Respect" has ever used the tube in the morning rush
hour?

--
Everything above is the personal opinion of the author, and nothing to do
with where he works and all that lovely disclaimery stuff.
Posted in his lunch hour too.

In article , (Paul
Weaver) wrote:

"Respect" are promising a £1 flat fare for tube use. They want *more*
people to use the tube.

I wonder if anyone in "Respect" has ever used the tube in the morning
rush hour?

Promises are cheap if you don't have to make them happen.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

In article , (Paul
Weaver) wrote:

"Respect" are promising a £1 flat fare for tube use. They want *more*
people
to use the tube.

I wonder if anyone in "Respect" has ever used the tube in the morning
rush
hour?

--
Everything above is the personal opinion of the author, and nothing to
do
with where he works and all that lovely disclaimery stuff.
Posted in his lunch hour too.



According to the Standard, TFL want to put the peak fares UP to stop
people using the tubes and go on the buses instead!

Roger

In article , ()
wrote:

In article ,
(Paul Weaver) wrote:

"Respect" are promising a £1 flat fare for tube use. They want *more*
people
to use the tube.

I wonder if anyone in "Respect" has ever used the tube in the morning
rush
hour?

--
Everything above is the personal opinion of the author, and nothing
to do
with where he works and all that lovely disclaimery stuff.
Posted in his lunch hour too.



According to the Standard, TFL want to put the peak fares UP to stop
people using the tubes and go on the buses instead!

Roger

I see that there was a Letter in yesterday's Standard from Ken Livingston
saying that they had no intention that they were going to make Oyster
cards compulsory and that they weren't going to put peak fares up and that
he had already told the Standard it was a load of ******** (or something
like that!)

Roger

On Wed, 12 May 2004 13:41:53 +0100, "Paul Weaver"
wrote:

"Respect" are promising a £1 flat fare for tube use. They want *more* people
to use the tube.

I wonder if anyone in "Respect" has ever used the tube in the morning rush
hour?

Who or what are "Respect"?


Cheers,

Jason.

"Respect" are promising a £1 flat fare for tube use. They want *more*
people
to use the tube.

I wonder if anyone in "Respect" has ever used the tube in the morning
rush
hour?

Who or what are "Respect"?

this lot: http://www.respectfestival.org.uk/ ?

Mark Fried wrote:
"Respect" are promising a £1 flat fare for tube use. They want
*more* people to use the tube.

I wonder if anyone in "Respect" has ever used the tube in the
morning rush hour?

Who or what are "Respect"?

this lot: http://www.respectfestival.org.uk/ ?

No, it's this lot: http://www.respectcoalition.com/

They are a political party contesting the GLA and London Mayoral
elections (candidate for the latter, Lindsey German). As far as I can
see, their many costly proposals are supposed to be funded by local
income tax and higher business rates, neither of which they would have
the power to implement.

--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)

Glasgow Subway is £1 single. And since it's a circle, you can get a lot for
your pound. You can go round and round and round and round and round and
round and round all day (if you're sufficiently sad).

Also, you never have to miss your stop, just wait for it to come round again
(I did steal this idea from someone else).

--
"We are now approaching Paisley Gilmour Street"