Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Anderson wrote:
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Clive D. W. Feather wrote: In article , Boltar writes Am I the only person who can't see the point of this link? If they want the tube to go to Watford Junction why not just re-extend the bakerloo line? Its a logical and direct route, whereas this extension couldn't be more round the houses if it tried. Why on earth would someone want to travel almost out to buckinghamshire to go around in a semi circle just to travel to watford junction? Curiously, some people don't start their journeys in London. This isn't aimed at the people living or working in London (who can use the Silverlink trains already). It's for those who live in Pinner and Rickmansworth and Buckinghamshire who want to get to Watford shops or the WCML trains. So why is it being built by Transport for London? tom It's not - because it lies outside the Greater London Authority, Hertfordshire County Council have claimed that they will stump up a significant portion of funding. IIRC, like Buckinghamshire and Essex, they already subsidise TfL for the right to have Underground service because they are outside the GLA, with Essex providing the most subsidy (that's why they're in Zones 5 and 6 and not letter zones, IIRC). Brad |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Croxley Link Progress? | London Transport | |||
Croxley Link progress | London Transport | |||
Croxley Link progress | London Transport | |||
Croxley Link progress | London Transport | |||
Croxley Link progress | London Transport |