Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Viewed from the road bridge, it looks as if the electrification masts for the new third track foul where the fourth track would go. I thought all of the present work was supposed to allow passive provision for Crossrail 2? -- Basil Jet - Current favourite song... Spratleys Japs - Hands (Marc Riley session) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTFmVrE1WAc |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 20:28:27 on Sun, 7 Apr 2019,
Basil Jet remarked: Viewed from the road bridge, it looks as if the electrification masts for the new third track foul where the fourth track would go. I thought all of the present work was supposed to allow passive provision for Crossrail 2? Wouldn't OHL be an active provision, rather than the passive provision of a trackbed? -- Roland Perry |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 20:28:27 on Sun, 7 Apr 2019, Basil Jet remarked: Viewed from the road bridge, it looks as if the electrification masts for the new third track foul where the fourth track would go. I thought all of the present work was supposed to allow passive provision for Crossrail 2? Wouldn't OHL be an active provision, rather than the passive provision of a trackbed? Passive provision for the fourth track would include not building OLÉ masts where you want to put that fourth track; little if any extra cost now, for a huge saving if/when that fourth track is required. Anna Noyd-Dryver |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 08:55:59 on Mon, 8 Apr 2019,
Anna Noyd-Dryver remarked: Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 20:28:27 on Sun, 7 Apr 2019, Basil Jet remarked: Viewed from the road bridge, it looks as if the electrification masts for the new third track foul where the fourth track would go. I thought all of the present work was supposed to allow passive provision for Crossrail 2? Wouldn't OHL be an active provision, rather than the passive provision of a trackbed? Passive provision for the fourth track would include not building OLÉ masts where you want to put that fourth track; little if any extra cost now, for a huge saving if/when that fourth track is required. Ok, so what's the answer? No passive provision required, passive protection botched, or passive possession not botched as much as the OP claims? -- Roland Perry |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 07/04/2019 20:28, Basil Jet wrote:
Viewed from the road bridge, it looks as if the electrification masts for the new third track foul where the fourth track would go. I thought all of the present work was supposed to allow passive provision for Crossrail 2? I've found an answer to this at https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/blog/201...-close-in-may/ ++++++++++++ First of all, Network Rail heavily value engineered the route, destroying any passive provision there would have been, see my FOI on this: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/reque...engineering_ex Furthermore, even the previous planning documents prior to the value engineering conceded that track would have to be re-laid for quad tracking. This means demolition of signalling and overhead wires and a long period when Northumberland Park and Meridian Water will be closed during that period of reconstruction. Clearly a lack of joint up thinking, forward planning and accountability from Network Rail, are we surprised? Secondly, whilst the new station is opening, Abellio Greater Anglia confirmed at the recent stakeholder meeting that the third track is not ready and will not be operational in 2019 with no information about when it will become operational or when trains and drivers will be available for the 2tph all week service. The next timetable will have no changes, with just ten trains a day in each direction (peak only) and no weekend service. Hence the reason why there is only a soft opening of the station, no grand opening. ++++++++++++ -- Basil Jet recently enjoyed listening to Andy Partridge - Fuzzy Warbles Volume 1 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was at Tottenham Hale yesterday. Most of the new Platform 2
is open. At the country end it makes a conventional island platform with 3; in other words the surface is level. At the London end, Platform 2 is lower than Platform 3 and a barrier has been installed to prevent people tripping over. The new footbridge is open but neither the lifts nor the escalators are working yet. The second gateway on Platform 4 is functioning now. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tottenham Hale Bus Station | London Transport | |||
Tottenham Hale | London Transport | |||
Tottenham Hale Bus Station | London Transport |