Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#111
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Many of the hotels advertise a hotel transfer service, but this turns out to be a minicab in many cases. a pre-arranged Taxi it almost always is (not all countries have the concept of mini-cabs) the world over tim Is this a problem for you.? Or are there more than four people that need to go to the airport at once... |
#112
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 02/10/2019 16:39, Roland Perry wrote:
so if you have a long term job at LHR moving house seems the most appropriate solution What are these long term jobs of which you speak? And moving house to be near a job, especially one like Heathrow, isn't a walk in the park. If as seems to be the case a lot of people have to rent privately if working in the London area, then a move is not out of the question as most leases are for six months at a time. And it's a move to make travel to work easier rather than have multiple changes on PT. |
#113
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 13:29:20 on Thu, 3 Oct
2019, Sammi Gray-Jones remarked: Many of the hotels advertise a hotel transfer service, but this turns out to be a minicab in many cases. a pre-arranged Taxi it almost always is (not all countries have the concept of mini-cabs) the world over tim Is this a problem for you.? Or are there more than four people that need to go to the airport at once... I have two problems with it: 1) The fare is likely to be much higher than a minibus 2) Experience shows that airport shuttle buses are much more reliable -- Roland Perry |
#114
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 13:35:51 on Thu, 3 Oct
2019, Sammi Gray-Jones remarked: On 02/10/2019 16:39, Roland Perry wrote: so if you have a long term job at LHR moving house seems the most appropriate solution What are these long term jobs of which you speak? And moving house to be near a job, especially one like Heathrow, isn't a walk in the park. If as seems to be the case a lot of people have to rent privately if working in the London area, then a move is not out of the question as most leases are for six months at a time. And it's a move to make travel to work easier rather than have multiple changes on PT. It's still uprooting the whole family. -- Roland Perry |
#115
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 19:14:28 on Wed, 2 Oct 2019, tim... remarked: "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 10:34:39 on Wed, 2 Oct 2019, tim... remarked: I live north of the river, and my rail journeys to and from Heathrow are always on the Piccadilly line. The Picc serves far more stations in London than Crossrail will. It's a rather tedious way to get to and from work at Heathrow, if you live north of Kings Cross. Is there a better way using PT? Obviously, people who don't live near a Piccadilly line station might change to the line at, say, Finsbury Park. As the Irishman asked for directions famously said "I wouldn't start from there". so if you have a long term job at LHR moving house seems the most appropriate solution What are these long term jobs of which you speak? Working full time at the airport If there is any "low" skilled job that has security, this has to be it. There's still plenty of opportunity to be working for an employer who goes broke or decide not to have a base at HR any more, or be replaced by a machine (baggage handling a prime example). And moving house to be near a job, especially one like Heathrow, isn't a walk in the park. If you already live in a different part of London it is. Moving further than a sensible commute for the children to get to their original school is difficult. so they move school thousands of children do it every year it's not impossible Hounslow is not a prime London property location For a reason. And hence why would people want to move there? Because if they are in London and can only afford "Hounslow" prices, they will already be living in an undesirable area of London But if you can afford more there are are desirable areas that are commutable as well I am making the point that if you already live in London and you move, you can make a like for like move at your price point and still be in a area with the same amount of desirableness (or un-desirableness). You don't have to find an extra 300K because the starting point is 300K more than where you have come from tim |
#116
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sammi Gray-Jones" wrote in message ... Many of the hotels advertise a hotel transfer service, but this turns out to be a minicab in many cases. a pre-arranged Taxi it almost always is (not all countries have the concept of mini-cabs) the world over tim Is this a problem for you.? not really I just dislike hotels that advertise "airport shuttle available" when what they mean is "if you ask the desk we will ring up a taxi for you, which you will pay for". That's hardly a service that merits shouting about - it's a bog standard service that every hotel above a minimum standard offers. tim |
#117
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message news ![]() In message , at 13:35:51 on Thu, 3 Oct 2019, Sammi Gray-Jones remarked: On 02/10/2019 16:39, Roland Perry wrote: so if you have a long term job at LHR moving house seems the most appropriate solution What are these long term jobs of which you speak? And moving house to be near a job, especially one like Heathrow, isn't a walk in the park. If as seems to be the case a lot of people have to rent privately if working in the London area, then a move is not out of the question as most leases are for six months at a time. And it's a move to make travel to work easier rather than have multiple changes on PT. It's still uprooting the whole family. but you make that choice when you take the job suffer the commute or move if you're not prepared to do either, don't take the job tim -- Roland Perry |
#118
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#119
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 10:47:38
on Fri, 4 Oct 2019, David Cantrell remarked: On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 11:56:27AM +0000, wrote: On Thu, 03 Oct 2019 12:43:48 +0100 David Cantrell wrote: On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 04:39:40PM +0100, Roland Perry wrote: And moving house to be near a job, especially one like Heathrow, isn't a walk in the park. It's something that vast numbers of people did in the past, and that a lot of people still do. I've done it myself. Not quite so easy if you have a spouse who also works and kids who go to school. Are they supposed to just up sticks because you've had enough of your commute? I repeat, it's something that lots of people have done, and lots of people do do, so is clearly not completely unreasonable. First you have to finds a school with places, and the good ones are likely to be full. Even if you are turning up for the first year of Secondary because the allocations will have been done 9mths earlier. The children will lose their friends, places on sports teams, have a new set of teachers, strange classmates, quite likely a different syllabus with some subjects not available, and in the run-up to public exams this can be very seriously disrupting. Picking things up part-way through an academic year just makes it worse. Buying new school uniforms is just a drop in the ocean. A family is all about compromise though and I don't pretend, unlike some people on the internet, to have The Answer For Everyone. A lot of people move to be near a school they want for their children. That's a compromise where parents likely have a longer commute. -- Roland Perry |
#120
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 14:00:30 on Thu, 3 Oct 2019,
tim... remarked: And moving house to be near a job, especially one like Heathrow, isn't a walk in the park. If you already live in a different part of London it is. Moving further than a sensible commute for the children to get to their original school is difficult. so they move school thousands of children do it every year it's not impossible See my reply to David. Hounslow is not a prime London property location For a reason. And hence why would people want to move there? Because if they are in London and can only afford "Hounslow" prices, they will already be living in an undesirable area of London Not true. Price reflects convenience as well as posh-ness. But if you can afford more there are are desirable areas that are commutable as well By bus, remember (unless you are looking at only the Heathrow Connect/ Piccadilly Line corridor). I am making the point that if you already live in London and you move, you can make a like for like move at your price point and still be in a area with the same amount of desirableness (or un-desirableness). You don't have to find an extra 300K because the starting point is 300K more than where you have come from People relying on public transport are usually a bit below that price bracket. Renting, probably (with mobility in public housing severely restricted). -- Roland Perry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|