Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 10:39:05 +0100
Scott wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:46:10 +0000 (UTC), wrote: On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 23:48:23 +0100 Basil Jet wrote: https://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/herit...-could-be-demo li shed-1-6733534 Never mind demolishing it - they should reinstate the line to muswell hill. All the trackbed is still in situ from there back to highgate sidings and putting track back down and restoring highgate high level station would cost buttons in comparisons to white elephants such as crossrail. I'm pretty sure a shuttle service to and from highgate to catch the main northern line would be pretty popular given the current alternative is the bus to wood green. Which line? I believe the original 'Northern Heights' project was to extend the Northern Line to Alexandra Palace. Are you looking at a branch or just a shuttle from the high level station at Highgate? If the latter, could it be trams rather than trains? Yes, a shuttle to highgate high level. Taking the line back to finsbury park would be next to impossible now and the short section from muswell hill to the palace has a school built on the trackbed so thats a non starter. I guess you could use a tram but given there's a large northern line depot at highgate it would probably be easier just to use a northern line train, perhaps 3 cars only. Is the project to build a hotel at Alexandra Palace still live? Maybe the developers could contribute. Beats me, not heard about it. I don't live in that area but I do visit quite often. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 10:39:05 +0100 Scott wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:46:10 +0000 (UTC), wrote: On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 23:48:23 +0100 Basil Jet wrote: https://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/herit...-could-be-demo li shed-1-6733534 Never mind demolishing it - they should reinstate the line to muswell hill. All the trackbed is still in situ from there back to highgate sidings and putting track back down and restoring highgate high level station would cost buttons in comparisons to white elephants such as crossrail. I'm pretty sure a shuttle service to and from highgate to catch the main northern line would be pretty popular given the current alternative is the bus to wood green. Which line? I believe the original 'Northern Heights' project was to extend the Northern Line to Alexandra Palace. Are you looking at a branch or just a shuttle from the high level station at Highgate? If the latter, could it be trams rather than trains? Yes, a shuttle to highgate high level. Taking the line back to finsbury park would be next to impossible now and the short section from muswell hill to the palace has a school built on the trackbed so thats a non starter. I guess you could use a tram but given there's a large northern line depot at highgate it would probably be easier just to use a northern line train, perhaps 3 cars only. Although they're formed of two half-sets (DM-T-UNDM), I don't think any double-ended half sets exist, so there are no three-car trains to run. Anna Noyd-Dryver |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 07:12:50 -0000 (UTC)
Anna Noyd-Dryver wrote: wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 10:39:05 +0100 would probably be easier just to use a northern line train, perhaps 3 cars only. Although they're formed of two half-sets (DM-T-UNDM), I don't think any double-ended half sets exist, so there are no three-car trains to run. Ah, didn't know that. Well I'm sure they could sort something out but its all academic anyway as the line would never have happened anyway and certainly not now with the state of TfLs finances. Its a good thing the battersea extension is almost done or that would probably have got the chop but I suspect the bakerloo extension is now dead in the water. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 07:12:50 -0000 (UTC) Anna Noyd-Dryver wrote: wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 10:39:05 +0100 would probably be easier just to use a northern line train, perhaps 3 cars only. Although they're formed of two half-sets (DM-T-UNDM), I don't think any double-ended half sets exist, so there are no three-car trains to run. Ah, didn't know that. Well I'm sure they could sort something out but its all academic anyway as the line would never have happened anyway and certainly not now with the state of TfLs finances. Its a good thing the battersea extension is almost done or that would probably have got the chop but I suspect the bakerloo extension is now dead in the water. Yes, all TfL projects that weren't already under way are on hold. So, the new Piccadilly line train order is going ahead, but the extension of the order to replace the even-older Bakerloo line trains is on hold. That delay will become expensive if it leads to a break in production in Goole. And, of course, the Bakerloo extension, also on hold, will depend on the new train order going ahead. The Piccadilly resignalling, needed for a higher frequency service, is also on hold. So they can't order the extra trains that the Piccadilly would need for that higher frequency service. It really is a logjam. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott wrote:
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:34:16 +0000 (UTC), wrote: On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 07:12:50 -0000 (UTC) Anna Noyd-Dryver wrote: wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 10:39:05 +0100 would probably be easier just to use a northern line train, perhaps 3 cars only. Although they're formed of two half-sets (DM-T-UNDM), I don't think any double-ended half sets exist, so there are no three-car trains to run. Ah, didn't know that. Well I'm sure they could sort something out but its all academic anyway as the line would never have happened anyway and certainly not now with the state of TfLs finances. Its a good thing the battersea extension is almost done or that would probably have got the chop but I suspect the bakerloo extension is now dead in the water. I thought Battersea was external funding. I think only partly. But it does mean there are external contractual commitments to get it finished and open. There was also supposed to be an order for extra trains for the Northern line, but that was quietly dropped a while ago. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:58:34 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote: I think only partly. But it does mean there are external contractual commitments to get it finished and open. There was also supposed to be an order for extra trains for the Northern line, but that was quietly dropped a while ago. I wonder if they could tack a few onto the back of the picc order or whether the trains would be too different to be able to run on the northern without serious modifications. The northern line at 1 point had 3 different train types running on it - 38,59,72 so it wouldn't be unprecedented. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Park Avenue, NW2 | London Transport | |||
Fwd: Planets Gather on May 5 and May 17, 2000 | London Transport | |||
Extend the ELL to Alexandra Palace? | London Transport | |||
Whitton Avenue East / West | London Transport |