Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15/09/2020 22:15, Recliner wrote:
michael adams wrote: "Recliner" wrote in message ... D A Stocks wrote: "Graham Harrison" wrote in message ... On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:02:11 -0000 (UTC), Recliner wrote: D A Stocks wrote: It must be about time they dismantled the bridge for restoration and preservation as an exhibit elsewhere (e.g. in a park) and built something more suitable for 21st century traffic in its place. Attempting to repair and maintain a structure that is barely fit for purpose is a waste of time and money. Yes, that would probably be cheaper and quicker than restoring it to full service. I wonder if they'd be allowed to build a modern, much stronger, visually-identical replacement? If you preserve the original why do you need a visually identical replacement? Let's stop building faux-old buildings and structures and build something modern. Precisely. Why build a not fit for purpose visually identical replacement when you can put something useful there instead? The people in the area with river views would say any modern-looking, award-winning, bridge was 'hideous'. The only interesting bits are the truly extravagent cast iron mouldings at either end where the cables end. Of which fibreglass replicas could probably be cast from multiple moulds. The pillars in the middle are nothing special and the deck of the bridge doesn't form a pleasing single curve, but comprises four slightly curved straight sections. As it happens locals would probably welcome a more open view rather than having their view obscured by the thick cables and pepper pot pillars, IHMO while there are some truly outstanding bits, as a whole it doesn't really add up to much. There's bound to be some noisy heritage lobby that would be up in arms at any suggestion that the bridge be removed and replaced with an anonymous, low key modern bridge. Meanwhile, a solution is at hand: there is now a DfT task force in place! https://www.swlondoner.co.uk/hammersmith-bridge-task-force/ They're talking about £141m for repairs! I'm sure a decent, modern replacement bridge with a long life would cost a fraction of that. You are joking, two planks of wood and some potted palms have already cost more than that and the bridge was never built. -- Graeme Wall This account not read. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster System to become national by default. Is this a cunning plot- shock horror | London Transport | |||
Curious Tube map on BBC story | London Transport | |||
anouther Scandal Story | London Transport | |||
U-turn on horror poster | London Transport | |||
LU falling apart, shock horror | London Transport |