Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/02/05/london-no-longer-calling-population-shock-takes-hold/ Even when the last Covid restrictions are lifted from London, there may be a little less bustle on its streets and elbow-jostling at its drinking dens. One startling estimate that has caught the eye of economists warned the capital’s population may have plunged by 700,000 during the pandemic. That would equate to an 8pc drop and be the first slump in London’s population in more than 30 years. The capital has been the victim of decades-long migration trends suddenly reversing. But will that spell trouble for its economy? London’s population has been hit by a double whammy of both native and foreign-born workers moving out as office work has shifted online and industries have been temporarily shuttered. The home working revolution has tempted office workers out of London with many seeking cheaper rents. Meanwhile, some foreign-born workers that are vital for industries shut down by the pandemic, such as hospitality and tourism, are believed to have moved back to their countries of birth. There are signs that populations in Eastern European countries, such as Romania and Bulgaria, have risen markedly during the crisis as their brain drains reverse. … Paradigm shift A prolonged decline would not be unprecedented for the city. The last major population drop suffered by London was in the decades after the Second World War, driven by old industries falling away and government policy. Its population slid by a fifth, sinking almost 2 million by the end of the 1980s before the city enjoyed a renaissance led by booming financial services. O’Connor says the difference this time is the immediacy of the population shock: “You don't often get a shock, which is sudden and causes some sort of paradigm shift in business and employee behaviour.” Economists are still unsure how many workers will flood back to London once the pandemic has been brought under control. Demand for labour will rise sharply if the economy comes roaring back this year as expected. “My assumption would be that I would expect to see quite a strong bounce back,” says Paul Swinney, director of policy at Centre for Cities. He expects that London’s amenities will soon be “a big pull for people the way it was pre-Covid as well” after the pandemic dampened the benefits of living in a large city, such as nightlife, shopping and a shorter commute. Many of the capital’s foreign-born workers have retained the right to work in the UK, even if they temporarily moved away. Any shortfalls in the workforce may be easily filled initially, particularly given London has the highest unemployment rate in the UK at 7pc. But the new points-based immigration system makes it more difficult for low-paid and low-skilled workers new to the UK entering the jobs market after Brexit. However, Douglas McWilliams, deputy chairman of the Centre for Economics and Business Research, says it is unlikely that any low-skilled worker shortages will hold back the capital’s post-pandemic recovery. “Normally you can substitute low-skilled labour in some way… It will get sorted in one way or the other, or just simply get sorted by high productivity.” Longer-term remote working trends could prove a bigger threat to the capital than short-term shifts among foreign workers. Many companies with expensive office space in the capital have been surprised by the ease of the remote working shift. "It's not quite clear whether people are going to be working as much in London,” says McWilliams. “If they're not working as much in London, there'll be a knock-on effect on the supply of the restaurants, the bars, the clubs and they will lose a degree of critical mass.” A sustained decline would dent demand for services in the city but could also ease pressure on transport and housing. “The real long-term shift is fewer people will be looking to work in London, there'll be less demand for their services so one would expect fewer to come back in the future,” says O’Connor. That could lead to “some sort of downward spiral” as fewer office workers feed through to lower demand for the sandwich shops and pubs, he warns. Swinney adds property prices could "at least moderate if not fall, if you see population declines” but better affordability could in turn persuade more to move to the capital. Even once the pandemic has ended for the capital, London's population bust may be one of the longest lasting legacies from the crisis. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recliner wrote:
From https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/02/05/london-no-longer-calling-population-shock-takes-hold/ Even when the last Covid restrictions are lifted from London, there may be a little less bustle on its streets and elbow-jostling at its drinking dens. One startling estimate that has caught the eye of economists warned the capital’s population may have plunged by 700,000 during the pandemic. That would equate to an 8pc drop and be the first slump in London’s population in more than 30 years. The capital has been the victim of decades-long migration trends suddenly reversing. But will that spell trouble for its economy? A sustained decline would dent demand for services in the city but could also ease pressure on transport and housing. “The real long-term shift is fewer people will be looking to work in London, there'll be less demand for their services so one would expect fewer to come back in the future,” says O’Connor. That could lead to “some sort of downward spiral” as fewer office workers feed through to lower demand for the sandwich shops and pubs, he warns. Swinney adds property prices could "at least moderate if not fall, if you see population declines” but better affordability could in turn persuade more to move to the capital. Even once the pandemic has ended for the capital, London's population bust may be one of the longest lasting legacies from the crisis. As you reside there would this improve it by being a little less frenetic ? London *can be an interesting place to be though personally I prefer to visit as and when though if my father hadn’t died young it is possible we would never have moved away. However in recent times the few relatives who still live there have said at times it got too busy, Ironically one of the missus two brothers lived there for years and moved out 4 years ago and chose Bristol thinking it would be an interesting place to live but not as busy. He absolutely hated it and though slowed down by Covid affecting things has purchased a place in the Crouch End area and will be moving back as soon as some building work gets completed. I do wonder if he may regret that and find it has actually changed more than he realised, as Al Stuart wrote “Still you never see the change from day to day And no-one notices the customs slip away”. At 76 he won’t really want to move away again. * London of course is a bit simplistic, We and a relative still does lived in a part of Chiswick within 5min walking of the District and Piccadilly lines and equidistant from the well equipped high road and numerous bus routes that made access inward easy and not far from the roads to the west that made getting out by car straight forward. Not all areas are like that. GH |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marland wrote:
Recliner wrote: From https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/02/05/london-no-longer-calling-population-shock-takes-hold/ Even when the last Covid restrictions are lifted from London, there may be a little less bustle on its streets and elbow-jostling at its drinking dens. One startling estimate that has caught the eye of economists warned the capital’s population may have plunged by 700,000 during the pandemic. That would equate to an 8pc drop and be the first slump in London’s population in more than 30 years. The capital has been the victim of decades-long migration trends suddenly reversing. But will that spell trouble for its economy? A sustained decline would dent demand for services in the city but could also ease pressure on transport and housing. “The real long-term shift is fewer people will be looking to work in London, there'll be less demand for their services so one would expect fewer to come back in the future,” says O’Connor. That could lead to “some sort of downward spiral” as fewer office workers feed through to lower demand for the sandwich shops and pubs, he warns. Swinney adds property prices could "at least moderate if not fall, if you see population declines” but better affordability could in turn persuade more to move to the capital. Even once the pandemic has ended for the capital, London's population bust may be one of the longest lasting legacies from the crisis. As you reside there would this improve it by being a little less frenetic? No, not really. The 'missing' people are probably East Europeans who typically worked in the currently shuttered hospitality sector. I hope they return when the pubs and restaurants reopen, hopefully from April. My commuting days were long ago, so it doesn't matter to me if the rush hour trains and buses are packed, as I'm seldom sharing the cramped space. London *can be an interesting place to be though personally I prefer to visit as and when though if my father hadn’t died young it is possible we would never have moved away. However in recent times the few relatives who still live there have said at times it got too busy, Ironically one of the missus two brothers lived there for years and moved out 4 years ago and chose Bristol thinking it would be an interesting place to live but not as busy. He absolutely hated it and though slowed down by Covid affecting things has purchased a place in the Crouch End area and will be moving back as soon as some building work gets completed. I do wonder if he may regret that and find it has actually changed more than he realised, as Al Stuart wrote “Still you never see the change from day to day And no-one notices the customs slip away”. At 76 he won’t really want to move away again. * London of course is a bit simplistic, We and a relative still does lived in a part of Chiswick within 5min walking of the District and Piccadilly lines and equidistant from the well equipped high road and numerous bus routes that made access inward easy and not far from the roads to the west that made getting out by car straight forward. Not all areas are like that. Yes, that's a popular area to live, apart from the low flying aircraft landing at Heathrow. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recliner wrote:
Marland wrote: Recliner wrote: From https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/02/05/london-no-longer-calling-population-shock-takes-hold/ Even when the last Covid restrictions are lifted from London, there may be a little less bustle on its streets and elbow-jostling at its drinking dens. Even once the pandemic has ended for the capital, London's population bust may be one of the longest lasting legacies from the crisis. As you reside there would this improve it by being a little less frenetic? No, not really. The 'missing' people are probably East Europeans who typically worked in the currently shuttered hospitality sector. I hope they return when the pubs and restaurants reopen, hopefully from April. My commuting days were long ago, so it doesn't matter to me if the rush hour trains and buses are packed, as I'm seldom sharing the cramped space. London *can be an interesting place to be though personally I prefer to visit as and when though * London of course is a bit simplistic, We and a relative still does lived in a part of Chiswick within 5min walking of the District and Piccadilly lines and equidistant from the well equipped high road and numerous bus routes that made access inward easy and not far from the roads to the west that made getting out by car straight forward. Not all areas are like that. Yes, that's a popular area to live, apart from the low flying aircraft landing at Heathrow. True , but as my relative had a very good career with BOAC/BA it would be hypocritical to complain. Now days they seem to fly a bit further South than I remember on visits back in the 60’s, more over Putney ,Barnes ,Mortlake and an absolute nuisance at Kew Gardens as you walk around. GH |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marland wrote:
Recliner wrote: Marland wrote: Recliner wrote: From https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/02/05/london-no-longer-calling-population-shock-takes-hold/ Even when the last Covid restrictions are lifted from London, there may be a little less bustle on its streets and elbow-jostling at its drinking dens. Even once the pandemic has ended for the capital, London's population bust may be one of the longest lasting legacies from the crisis. As you reside there would this improve it by being a little less frenetic? No, not really. The 'missing' people are probably East Europeans who typically worked in the currently shuttered hospitality sector. I hope they return when the pubs and restaurants reopen, hopefully from April. My commuting days were long ago, so it doesn't matter to me if the rush hour trains and buses are packed, as I'm seldom sharing the cramped space. London *can be an interesting place to be though personally I prefer to visit as and when though * London of course is a bit simplistic, We and a relative still does lived in a part of Chiswick within 5min walking of the District and Piccadilly lines and equidistant from the well equipped high road and numerous bus routes that made access inward easy and not far from the roads to the west that made getting out by car straight forward. Not all areas are like that. Yes, that's a popular area to live, apart from the low flying aircraft landing at Heathrow. True , but as my relative had a very good career with BOAC/BA it would be hypocritical to complain. Now days they seem to fly a bit further South than I remember on visits back in the 60’s, more over Putney ,Barnes ,Mortlake and an absolute nuisance at Kew Gardens as you walk around. It depends on whether they're landing on 27L or 27R. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recliner wrote on Sat Feb 06 2021 16:11:25 GMT+0000 (Greenwich Mean Time) ...
Marland wrote: Recliner wrote: From https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/02/05/london-no-longer-calling-population-shock-takes-hold/ Even when the last Covid restrictions are lifted from London, there may be a little less bustle on its streets and elbow-jostling at its drinking dens. One startling estimate that has caught the eye of economists warned the capital’s population may have plunged by 700,000 during the pandemic. That would equate to an 8pc drop and be the first slump in London’s population in more than 30 years. The capital has been the victim of decades-long migration trends suddenly reversing. But will that spell trouble for its economy? A sustained decline would dent demand for services in the city but could also ease pressure on transport and housing. “The real long-term shift is fewer people will be looking to work in London, there'll be less demand for their services so one would expect fewer to come back in the future,” says O’Connor. That could lead to “some sort of downward spiral” as fewer office workers feed through to lower demand for the sandwich shops and pubs, he warns. Swinney adds property prices could "at least moderate if not fall, if you see population declines” but better affordability could in turn persuade more to move to the capital. Even once the pandemic has ended for the capital, London's population bust may be one of the longest lasting legacies from the crisis. As you reside there would this improve it by being a little less frenetic? No, not really. The 'missing' people are probably East Europeans who typically worked in the currently shuttered hospitality sector. I hope they return when the pubs and restaurants reopen, hopefully from April. My commuting days were long ago, so it doesn't matter to me if the rush hour trains and buses are packed, as I'm seldom sharing the cramped space. London *can be an interesting place to be though personally I prefer to visit as and when though if my father hadn’t died young it is possible we would never have moved away. However in recent times the few relatives who still live there have said at times it got too busy, Ironically one of the missus two brothers lived there for years and moved out 4 years ago and chose Bristol thinking it would be an interesting place to live but not as busy. He absolutely hated it and though slowed down by Covid affecting things has purchased a place in the Crouch End area and will be moving back as soon as some building work gets completed. I do wonder if he may regret that and find it has actually changed more than he realised, as Al Stuart wrote “Still you never see the change from day to day And no-one notices the customs slip away”. At 76 he won’t really want to move away again. * London of course is a bit simplistic, We and a relative still does lived in a part of Chiswick within 5min walking of the District and Piccadilly lines and equidistant from the well equipped high road and numerous bus routes that made access inward easy and not far from the roads to the west that made getting out by car straight forward. Not all areas are like that. Yes, that's a popular area to live, apart from the low flying aircraft landing at Heathrow. Anywhere in Chiswick within 5min walking of the District/Piccadilly (Chiswick Park or Turnham Green stations) is at least a mile north of the nearest landing path to Heathrow, so not too noisy. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard J. wrote:
Recliner wrote on Sat Feb 06 2021 16:11:25 GMT+0000 (Greenwich Mean Time) ... Marland wrote: * London of course is a bit simplistic, We and a relative still does lived in a part of Chiswick within 5min walking of the District and Piccadilly lines and equidistant from the well equipped high road and numerous bus routes that made access inward easy Yes, that's a popular area to live, apart from the low flying aircraft landing at Heathrow. Anywhere in Chiswick within 5min walking of the District/Piccadilly (Chiswick Park or Turnham Green stations) is at least a mile north of the nearest landing path to Heathrow, so not too noisy. Actually after I made my post I remembered that the Piccadilly is only available very early or late and on Sundays and of course it has to be Turnham Green, Chiswick Park hasn’t got platforms on the Piccadilly tracks. We were very close to Jones model shop as well but you have to be reasonably long in the tooth to remember them. GH |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"As a percentage of world inhabitants, the white population willplummet to a single digit (9.76%) by 2060 from a high-water mark of 27.98% in1950." | London Transport | |||
[OT] High-resolution population density data for London? | London Transport | |||
London population not increasing as much as Ken Livinstone says | London Transport |