Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Martin Underwood" wrote in message
s.com... "Clive" wrote in message ... In message m, Martin Underwood writes Do crash gearboxes actually engage the teeth of the gearwheels or do they engage dog-clutches (ie like a synchromesh box except without the synchromesh cones)? Cog meshing went out in the 1920s and since then it has always been dogs. So, given that post-1920s gearboxes had permanently-engaged cogs, of which one at a time was locked onto the shaft by dog clutches, why did it take so long for manufacturers to add that other little refinement, synchromesh cones? Just had a look in Alan Townsin's "The Bristol Story, Part 1", which has a picture of a KS-type 5-speed gearbox, with its top cover removed, on page 58. That had constant mesh 3rd and 5th gears, direct drive 4th gear, and sliding mesh cogs for 1st and 2nd. It was superseded in the 1950s by a synchromesh version. -- Terry Harper, Web Co-ordinator, The Omnibus Society 75th Anniversary 2004, see http://www.omnibussoc.org/75th.htm E-mail: URL: http://www.terry.harper.btinternet.co.uk/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NAO: Crossrail project "on course" to be value for money | London Transport | |||
Climate Change: Effective Communication Course | London Transport | |||
Tube Trains Sent On Collision Course | London Transport | |||
How bendy is a bendy bus? | London Transport | |||
But of course.... | London Transport |