| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
June 21st 04, 08:57 AM
posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.transport,uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
Everything we know about traffic-calming is wrong
Velvet wrote:
So in my experience (and I do speak from experience) when you avoid a skid in a non-abs car and the one in front does have it, you end up braking slower, with obvious consequences if you're close enough... You mean "too close". -- Mark. |
|
#2
June 21st 04, 06:23 PM
posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.transport,uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Everything we know about traffic-calming is wrong
Mark Tranchant wrote:
Velvet wrote: So in my experience (and I do speak from experience) when you avoid a skid in a non-abs car and the one in front does have it, you end up braking slower, with obvious consequences if you're close enough... You mean "too close". Indeed ;-) -- Velvet |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| have the time to do everything you want | London Transport | |||
| traffic is better, but livingstone is thinking of more traffic zone? | London Transport | |||
| Everything we know about traffic-calming is wrong | London Transport | |||
| Traffic Calming in Islington | London Transport | |||
| top up wrong Oyster (almost) | London Transport | |||
Hybrid Mode
