| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
June 23rd 04, 09:43 AM
posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.transport,uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
Everything we know about traffic-calming is wrong
"Just zis Guy, you know?" wrote in message
Probably depends on the location. Some roads have been made safer by doing just that. Certianly the experience where roads have been treated with lots of paint and signage has often been that drivers simply speed up and the crash rate remains unchanged. DfT research would appear to suggest otherwise. A number of test villages covering 30, 40, 50 and 60 limits. A variety of signage and paint changes. Every one resulted in lower mean and 85th percentile speeds. http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/group...504760-02.hcsp |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| have the time to do everything you want | London Transport | |||
| traffic is better, but livingstone is thinking of more traffic zone? | London Transport | |||
| Everything we know about traffic-calming is wrong | London Transport | |||
| Traffic Calming in Islington | London Transport | |||
| top up wrong Oyster (almost) | London Transport | |||
Threaded Mode
