Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 10:08:08 +0100, Tom Anderson
wrote: On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, John Rowland wrote: On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:49:53 +0100, Tom Anderson wrote: Why are bendy-buses not double-decker? You couldn't have a continuous floor upstairs Why not? I've heard this said elsewhere, so i assume it's true, but what's the problem? tom Think about how such a vehicle might have to articulate in the vertical plane when the front section reaches an incline before the rear. A hump back bridge could be an extreme example. Any flexible joint between the two upper deck sections would have to accommodate far more movement than the lower deck nearer the ground. The coach mentioned elsewhere in the thread shows it can be done but I would think its routes are far more restricted than what a vehicle on bus operation might encounter in its service life. And the cost of such a vehicle built in small numbers for a few limited routes and just a couple of operators makes building one unviable. G.Harman |