Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Nigel Pendse" wrote in message ...
"Alex Terrell" wrote in message om Would a lower cost option be to use diesel electric trains. These would use overhead electricity where available, but diesel generators elsewhere. Hence, no pollution in tunnels, but no need for further electrification. Is this feasible? Is it being considered? If not, why not? Would Britain's over-zealous safety culture allow diesel engines (even when turned off) with full fuel tanks to be carried through long, deep-bored single tunnel sections carrying passengers? After all, there will surely be leaks of fuel oil that will accumulate in the tunnel sections and would then become a fire/pollution threat. Also, how reliably can train diesels be re-started after being powered down for an hour or two? Surely its no harder than restarting a truck engine thats been off for a while? B2003 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Diesel loco in Crossrail construction | London Transport | |||
Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport | |||
Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail | London Transport |