Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alex Terrell" a écrit dans le message de om... "Jonn Elledge" wrote in message ... More useful, is it possible to send CrossRail through the CTRL link from Stratford to Ebbsfleet? Why? The point of the Ebbsfleet branch is surely not to link Ebbsfleet to Crossrail, but to connect the Isle of Dogs, Royal Docks and other more populated parts of North Kent. Thinking about this, I now agree - forget running CrossRail trains through the CTRL. But what domestic services should be run through the CTRL from 2007? After all, operators should start to order rolling stock about now. CTRL capacity is 16 tph. CTRL say there'll be capacity for 8 Eurostar tph, but at present they can't fill three, so I reckon there could be 8 to 12 domestic trains per hour running each way from St Pancras to Ebbsfleet. These could in theory be 16 cars long. Where should they go? Here's my thoughts. Assuming dual voltage trains that can run off overhead or third rail: SNIP Any thoughts? Your assumptions about the operation of Eurostars might not be valid, because as others have already pointed out, the present constraints, which are not very sensible, are liable to change. In particular, the reduction in journey times and improved timekeeping resulting from the completion of CTRL2 should boost demand substantially. But other potential changes could have a far greater impact, eg the introduction of measures to reduce congestion at London's airports by reducing the number of slots allocated for flights on routes where the overall journey time is typically longer than that by rail. The basic problem is that there is no obvious way to recover the enormous investment required to build the CRTL or Crossrail directly from fees paid its users (especially commuters); as in similar cases (eg the Jubilee Line and ELL extensions), the lion's share of the economic benefit goes to local landowners, who enjoy signficant consequential increases in property values. Only when you have solved it can we start meaningful discussions of train services. Regards, - Alan (in Brussels - mind the spamtrap) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"South Bank to benefit from zone 1 stations" | London Transport | |||
Benefit cost ratio on street signs | London Transport | |||
Would Oyster benefit me? | London Transport | |||
North London commuters to benefit from secure cycle parking in Finsbury Park | London Transport News | |||
Hayes (Kent) line | London Transport |