Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stuart wrote:
Proper buses that are cramped and uncomfortable. Never mind the infirm, those of us over 6 foot can't use them properly! Give me a bendy bus any day Just sit down. AIUI, bendy buses have fewer seats than Routemasters. Colin McKenzie -- The great advantage of not trusting statistics is that it leaves you free to believe the damned lies instead! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 at 09:58:02, Stuart
wrote: Proper buses that are cramped and uncomfortable. Never mind the infirm, those of us over 6 foot can't use them properly! Give me a bendy bus any day I mourn the demise of the conductor - and that is one of the main reasons for the demise of the Routemaster. Cost, I mean - cheaper to pay one person than two. Granted RMs are awkward for pushchairs, and impossible for wheelchair-users, but those who have other forms of disability used to be able to rely on a helping hand from the conductor, who would get them on and see them safely seated before allowing the bus to move off. Sigh.... I do agree, though, they are rather low in the ceiling (at 5'8", I have to bend, on the upper deck!). But no, not bendy buses - they make me feel sick, and there is no upper deck to go on where one can see where one is going.... -- Annabel Smyth http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/index.html Website updated 7 August 2004 - for a limited time, be bored by my holiday snaps! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Annabel Smyth
writes I mourn the demise of the conductor - and that is one of the main reasons for the demise of the Routemaster. Cost, I mean - cheaper to pay one person than two. Sadly yes. But I believe it's a false economy. Having extra people on hand helps with all sorts of things, mot least security, limiting damage and making people feel safer (and therefore happier to use public transport). Granted RMs are awkward for pushchairs, I beg to differ. For *folded* pushchairs they're better than most modern buses, thanks to the little "cubby hole" beneath the stairs. and impossible for wheelchair-users, Indeed, I agree. but those who have other forms of disability used to be able to rely on a helping hand from the conductor, who would get them on and see them safely seated before allowing the bus to move off. Sigh.... *Exactly* the situation my mother is in. She seldom visits London but it much happier with older buses as there are more grab-points than on wheelchair accessible ones (inevitably, since the wheelchairs naturally need circulating space). I do agree, though, they are rather low in the ceiling (at 5'8", I have to bend, on the upper deck!). But only to and from your seat. Not the greatest hardship in the world. But no, not bendy buses - they make me feel sick, Good for crush capacity short rides but I'm glad to see from elsewhere in this thread that I'm not alone in seeing them as being wasteful of road space. and there is no upper deck to go on where one can see where one is going.... Which is, of course, the end of civilization as we know it! :-) I'm still eager to find what the "tourist network" of RMs mentioned by Ken Livingstone a long time ago will turn out to be. -- Ian Jelf, MITG, Birmingham, UK Registered "Blue Badge" Tourist Guide for London & the Heart of England http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Stuart
writes wrote: The Business 1st August 2004 Business Platform by Ian Watson Why must the last bell sound for proper buses? Proper buses that are cramped and uncomfortable. Never mind the infirm, those of us over 6 foot can't use them properly! Give me a bendy bus any day Speaking of which, I saw a bendi-coach the other day; I didn't realise that such beasts existed... Mega-something or other IIRC. -- Kat |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Annabel Smyth
writes I mourn the demise of the conductor - and that is one of the main reasons for the demise of the Routemaster. Cost, I mean - cheaper to pay one person than two. Granted RMs are awkward for pushchairs, and impossible for wheelchair-users, but those who have other forms of disability used to be able to rely on a helping hand from the conductor, who would get them on and see them safely seated before allowing the bus to move off. Sigh.... I do agree, though, they are rather low in the ceiling (at 5'8", I have to bend, on the upper deck!). But no, not bendy buses - they make me feel sick, and there is no upper deck to go on where one can see where one is going.... I rather like bendi-buses; they somehow remind me off camels in the way they get up from the kerb before they leave.. -- Kat |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:24:07 +0100, Colin McKenzie
wrote: Just sit down. I would if there was any legroom. The only place I can sit is either right at the front or on the side-facing seats, and in the latter case my knees block the aisle. AIUI, bendy buses have fewer seats than Routemasters. I'd rather stand in comfort than sit with my knees up my nose. The Routemasters are fun, but regardless of the accessibility issue they are not suited to the modern day. The bendies are better, as are those newer deckers with lots of legroom on the upper deck. Also, a good two-doored double-decker loads and unloads far quicker than the single-entrance Routemaster. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK To e-mail use neil at the above domain |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:43:54 +0100, Annabel Smyth
wrote: I mourn the demise of the conductor I don't. Having a conductor means they have to move around the bus, and that means crush-loading isn't possible, and you can't stand just because you want to because you're only going two stops. Off-bus ticketing is the answer, though those TfL machines are of a very poor design; counterintuitive and unreliable. Oyster will certainly help matters, though it'd be good to push the Saver 6 a bit harder as well. Granted RMs are awkward for pushchairs, and impossible for wheelchair-users, but those who have other forms of disability used to be able to rely on a helping hand from the conductor, who would get them on and see them safely seated before allowing the bus to move off. Sigh.... It's sad that in London and the other big cities there's such a safety issue with the driver emerging from his cab to help with such things, as you often see elsewhere. However, merely waiting for someone to sit down before departure will probably cover that in most cases. But no, not bendy buses - they make me feel sick Why? They're only elongated single-deckers. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK To e-mail use neil at the above domain |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Neil Williams" wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:43:54 +0100, Annabel Smyth wrote: I mourn the demise of the conductor I don't. Having a conductor means they have to move around the bus, and that means crush-loading isn't possible, and you can't stand just because you want to because you're only going two stops. Off-bus ticketing is the answer, though those TfL machines are of a very poor design; counterintuitive and unreliable. Oyster will certainly help matters, though it'd be good to push the Saver 6 a bit harder as well. And those TFL machines don't accept notes |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Annabel Smyth wrote:
NO WAY! And yes, I did mean to shout. People get on a Routemaster, sit down, and then look for their Oyster or their fare. On a 2-door bus, first of all the driver very often doesn't open the entrance door until people have finished getting off, and then you have to wait while everybody faffs around finding their pass or their Oyster, or getting out a ticket, or even buying one, outside the central zone. Takes far, far longer than on a RM. But on a routemaster everyone standing who doesn't want to get off (such as us 6 footers who can't sit) has to move out the way to let those who are getting off get off. There is always a bottleneck just inside the door. The driver of a 2 door bus only holds the front doors when the bus is full - it's entirely sensible to wait to see how many get off before letting the same amount on In Central London there is no faffing to find tickets.... you don't need money or tickets, just walk straight on and you might get ticket checked. I agree a conductor would be good, but for fare evasion purposes. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Routemaster lament | London Transport | |||
Routemaster lament | London Transport | |||
Routemaster lament | London Transport | |||
Routemaster lament | London Transport | |||
A Commuter's Lament | London Transport |