Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a resident of West Norwood I'm delighted that someone thinks we're
important enough to merit an express bus service. But why has this strange relic survived? I know the 68 was split in two a while ago, but would be fascinated to hear if anyone knows more about the history... |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rupert Candy" wrote in message m... As a resident of West Norwood I'm delighted that someone thinks we're important enough to merit an express bus service. But why has this strange relic survived? I know the 68 was split in two a while ago, but would be fascinated to hear if anyone knows more about the history... For one thing it is a direct link between West Croydon and Central London without having to change. I used to drive number 68. the X68 could be significantly quicker especially if there were a bus or 2 missing in front of me. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert Woolley" wrote in message
... I understand that this was reviewed by London Buses and the view was that the service was worth keeping. If so, aren't similar services elsewhere worth introducing? -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland wrote:
"Robert Woolley" wrote in message ... I understand that this was reviewed by London Buses and the view was that the service was worth keeping. If so, aren't similar services elsewhere worth introducing? There are, I think, a few other routes with non-stop sections, e.g. the 96 between Dartford and Bluewater. -- John Ray, London UK. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Ray wrote:
John Rowland wrote: "Robert Woolley" wrote in message ... I understand that this was reviewed by London Buses and the view was that the service was worth keeping. If so, aren't similar services elsewhere worth introducing? There are, I think, a few other routes with non-stop sections, e.g. the 96 between Dartford and Bluewater. There's also the 607 (Shepherd's Bush to Uxbridge) limited-stop service over the same route as the all-stops 207. I notice that the X68 is pick-up only between West Croydon and West Norwood in the mornings, and similarly between Russell Square and Waterloo in the evening peak. Are there any other London buses with pick-up-only or set-down-only restrictions in mid-route? -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard J." wrote in message
... There's also the 607 (Shepherd's Bush to Uxbridge) limited-stop service over the same route as the all-stops 207. During the hours that the 607 operates, the 207 operates as two overlapping sections, so there are some journeys for which only the 607 will do. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Rowland" wrote in message ...
"Robert Woolley" wrote in message ... I understand that this was reviewed by London Buses and the view was that the service was worth keeping. If so, aren't similar services elsewhere worth introducing? Indeed - it's hard to see why the 68 is such a special case! ISTR there being an X43 about 10 years ago (it was called "Red Route" or something similarly silly and I think it went all the way to Potters Bar). Were there any others within recent memory? I suppose the 607 to Uxbridge is a similar beast, really. Any suggestions for new routes that should be introduced? X133 (first stop Streatham) would seem a likely one to me, and perhaps X53 and X25 (both of which seem very busy and are long routes). |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I understand that this was reviewed by London Buses
and the view was that the service was worth keeping. If so, aren't similar services elsewhere worth introducing? Any suggestions for new routes that should be introduced? X133 (first stop Streatham) would seem a likely one to me Surely first stop Brixton? Big massive rail / tube / bus interchange thingy. In that area, how about an X150 or an X250? These routes are long and very very slow. Also X65. Matt Ashby |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why does the jubilee keep on failing all the time ? | London Transport | |||
Safe nuclear does exist, and China is leading the way with thorium | London Transport | |||
Barking to Stratford - the service that doesn't exist. | London Transport | |||
Do platform tickets still exist for (i) tube and (ii) overground please? | London Transport | |||
Why does this NG attract so much racist comment ? | London Transport |