Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Does anyone know what percentage of revenue from these machines merely covers overheads? By overheads, I am thinking of: i) Purchase/leasing and installation (depreciated over the estimated life of the machine). ii) Electricity iii) Consumables (parts, paper for tickets etc). iv) Repairs/fixing vandalism v) Paying a team of people to drive around London in 20mpg top-of-the-range Ford Focus estate cars to empty them vi) Fraud (attaching devices etc to empty the machines of cash). vii) Cleaning The machines have very limited functionality (single trip tickets, one day bus passes and that's it) so are not well used IMX. If TfL were commercially aware, they could have added Travelcard functionality and the ability to pay by credit/debit card, but they aren't so they didn't. Chris |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:12:38 +0000 (UTC), "Chris Read"
wrote: Does anyone know what percentage of revenue from these machines merely covers overheads? By overheads, I am thinking of: i) Purchase/leasing and installation (depreciated over the estimated life of the machine). ii) Electricity iii) Consumables (parts, paper for tickets etc). iv) Repairs/fixing vandalism v) Paying a team of people to drive around London in 20mpg top-of-the-range Ford Focus estate cars to empty them vi) Fraud (attaching devices etc to empty the machines of cash). vii) Cleaning No idea but I assume that the passenger benefits from quicker boarding significantly outweigh the costs so therefore in TfL Business Case terms it is a no brainer. The machines have very limited functionality (single trip tickets, one day bus passes and that's it) so are not well used IMX. If TfL were commercially aware, they could have added Travelcard functionality and the ability to pay by credit/debit card, but they aren't so they didn't. Nothing to do with commercial awareness and everything to do with the fact that the machines are simply *******ised car park machines. They could never issue Travelcards because they need to be magnetically encoded. This would add to the capital cost, maintenance cost and consumable costs. Also a bit pointless when there is a dense rail network which can vend such tickets plus thousands of Ticket Stops which can also do so. The use of credit and debit cards is pointless for machines selling something costing at a maximum £2.50. There is also the issue of commission and how anti fraud checks would be carried out. This is not something that is in the gift of TfL - the banks would almost certainly insist on a range of on line checks (thus adding to costs) or else they would bump up the commission charges to reflect the fraud risk. Either way it costs more to TfL and in the latter cash potentially the passenger. Who would want to pay £2.70 for a £2.50 One Day Bus Pass for the privilege of using plastic as payment? The machines were bought down to a price to do a simple task - i.e. get the cashless concept in and "working" as quickly as possible. I don't like the machines - and I say this as someone who is a bit of an expert on ticket machines - but I do recognise why they were bought. The commercial awareness bit comes from offering an alternative called Oyster Pre Pay or Saver tickets both of which offer a hefty discount over paying cash and which are convenient to use. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The machines have very limited functionality (single trip tickets, one
day bus passes and that's it) so are not well used IMX. If TfL were commercially aware, they could have added Travelcard functionality and the ability to pay by credit/debit card, but they aren't so they didn't. Nothing to do with commercial awareness and everything to do with the fact that the machines are simply *******ised car park machines. They could never issue Travelcards because they need to be magnetically encoded. This would add to the capital cost, maintenance cost and consumable costs. Also a bit pointless when there is a dense rail network which can vend such tickets plus thousands of Ticket Stops which can also do so. One thing which they won't do, which drives me around the bend, is sell you two single tickets in exchange for a £2 coin. If a £2 coin is all you have, you can only buy a single £1 ticket and receive no change. I expected I could just press the £1 ticket twice to get it to print 2 and charge me £2... but no. Grr! It's caught me out a couple of times! D. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() The commercial awareness bit comes from offering an alternative called Oyster Pre Pay or Saver tickets both of which offer a hefty discount over paying cash and which are convenient to use. -- Paul C Why is it beyond the wit of TFL to extend Oyster to one-day Travelcards? Marc. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Corfield wrote in
: The machines were bought down to a price to do a simple task - i.e. get the cashless concept in and "working" as quickly as possible. I don't like the machines - and I say this as someone who is a bit of an expert on ticket machines - but I do recognise why they were bought. One recent journey on the 243: passenger boards at Holborn "the ticket machine doesn't work" Told to get off and try again, which she does, without success, and re- boards "it doesn't work". Bus travels to next stop where she gets off to try again. Inserts coin, presses cancel button (the machine was in full view of the bus), gets back on "it doesn't work". Bus travels to next stop, now outside the pay-before-you-board area. Driver issues ticket. The following 243 is now right behind. It is time the rules on drivers not issuing tickets in the pay-before-you- board area were relaxed. The machines simply make bus travel more difficult - mainly for the occasional users who need to be tempted out of their cars! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Corfield" wrote: The use of credit and debit cards is pointless for machines selling something costing at a maximum £2.50. c2c and London Underground both have machines at my local stations, which are happy to take my plastic for a £1.50 return to Upminster, and this is how I typically pay. Carrying around shedloads of coins destroys suit trouser pockets. I accept the average fare at these machines is going to be above £2.50, but probably no more than £5. There is also the issue of commission and how anti fraud checks would be carried out. This is not something that is in the gift of TfL - the banks would almost certainly insist on a range of on line checks (thus adding to costs) or else they would bump up the commission charges to reflect the fraud risk. No different for ticket machines at LU/National Rail stations. At these values, the transactions would probably be below the retailer 'floor limit', and therefore there wouldn't be any fraud checks as such. There would need to be a telecoms link from the machines to a Bank data centre, but I imagine the machines are already telecoms wired for remote fault reporting etc. And I don't understand the point about commission charges. Yes, there would be a card interchange fee payable by TfL every time a card was used - but surely they are charged every time they go to the Bank with a bag of miscellaneous coins to pay in? In addition, they pay someone to empty the machine and someone else to sort and bag the coin. IMX most businesses drastically underestimate the costs of cash handling, because it isn't a very exciting matter to think about. Either way it costs more to TfL and in the latter cash potentially the passenger. Who would want to pay £2.70 for a £2.50 One Day Bus Pass for the privilege of using plastic as payment? It shouldn't be necessary to charge a premium - but if it was, I suspect most people would consider 20 pence a negligible sum. Plenty of people pay £1 to use 'remote' ATMs in convenience stores rather than walk to the nearest Bank, and plenty of Ebay users are willing to pay a premium to use Paypal, rather than fanny around with letters, stamps and cheques. Chris |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:55:32 +0000 (UTC), David Jackman
wrote: It is time the rules on drivers not issuing tickets in the pay-before-you- board area were relaxed. The machines simply make bus travel more difficult - mainly for the occasional users who need to be tempted out of their cars! That's because the machines are counter-intuitive. It would only take a software modification to change them to operate in a logical fashion as follows:- 1) Insert coin or coins, showing credit on screen. 2) Push ticket button to issue ticket. 3) Repeat (2) if desired until credit is exhausted. rather than the other way around as at present, which seems to confuse just about everyone. Also, remove those stupid black coin-catcher devices. They may stop people stuffing undesirable items into the coin slot, but they also mean that if a coin gets slightly stuck it cannot be retrieved/pushed in without violence against the machine, which won't do anything to extend their working lives. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK To e-mail use neil at the above domain |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David FitzGerald" wrote in message
One thing which they won't do, which drives me around the bend, is sell you two single tickets in exchange for a £2 coin. If a £2 coin is all you have, you can only buy a single £1 ticket and receive no change. I expected I could just press the £1 ticket twice to get it to print 2 and charge me £2... but no. Grr! It's caught me out a couple of times! To lose one £2 coin may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness. Lady Bracknell |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am particularly interested in the comments/questions Chris asked about the roadside ticketing machines. Chris did you get a response or know the answer or does anyone else?
Surely as Oyster has become more poplular these machines are hardly used! [ QUOTE=Chris Read;19579]Does anyone know what percentage of revenue from these machines merely covers overheads? By overheads, I am thinking of: i) Purchase/leasing and installation (depreciated over the estimated life of the machine). ii) Electricity iii) Consumables (parts, paper for tickets etc). iv) Repairs/fixing vandalism v) Paying a team of people to drive around London in 20mpg top-of-the-range Ford Focus estate cars to empty them vi) Fraud (attaching devices etc to empty the machines of cash). vii) Cleaning The machines have very limited functionality (single trip tickets, one day bus passes and that's it) so are not well used IMX. If TfL were commercially aware, they could have added Travelcard functionality and the ability to pay by credit/debit card, but they aren't so they didn't. Chris[/quote] |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What happened to the LU ticket office ticket machines? | London Transport | |||
TfL To Remove Roadside Ticket Machines For Buses | London Transport | |||
Roadside Ticket Machines run by London Buses - how useful / reliableare they? | London Transport | |||
Bus ticket machines | London Transport | |||
Central London Bus Ticket Machines: drivers ability to know if they are in order ? | London Transport |