Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi there,
Currently in possession of a Z12 travelcard and want to use Silverlink to go from West Hampstead to Highbury & Islington. Possible or do I need to fork out extra as the train flirts with Z3 at Hampstead Heath? Thanks in advance! Regards, Nes. -- Please remove the spam-deflecting X's to reply directly to me - or simply reply to the group! -- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Nestor Badudoy wrote: Hi there, Currently in possession of a Z12 travelcard and want to use Silverlink to go from West Hampstead to Highbury & Islington. Possible or do I need to fork out extra as the train flirts with Z3 at Hampstead Heath? It does more than 'flirt'; it positivly enters zone 3 at that station. You will need to get a zone 123 travelcard to travel from West Hampstead & Highbury & Islington. Or something. Or take a bus as far as Gospel Oak; get a Thameslink service into Kings Cross and get the Victoria Line out; or get the Jubilee and Victoria; or ... -- You dont have to be illiterate to use the Internet, but it help's. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Currently in possession of a Z12 travelcard and want to use Silverlink to go from West Hampstead to Highbury & Islington. Possible or do I need to fork out extra as the train flirts with Z3 at Hampstead Heath? The Zone 2/3 border was slyly moved south of Hampstead Heath station several years ago, even though Hampstead Heath is nearer the centre of London than Hampstead tube station (Zones 2/3). This made my Zones 1and 2 travelcard invalid for westward journeys further than Gospel Oak, even though after Hampstead Heath the next five stations are once again in Zone 2. Grr. Guy |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was looking at the map. Apparently, unless I'm readnig wrong, the line is
in Z3 from Kew to South Action, then a one stop venture into Z2 for Acton Central, then back to Z3 for one stop (Willseden), then back and forth! Why not make the line an exception and allow Z2 and Z3 tickets (like, for example, Tramlink)? Am I missing something? What do others think? Regards, Nes. -- Please remove the spam-deflecting X's to reply directly to me - or simply reply to the group! -- wrote in message ... Currently in possession of a Z12 travelcard and want to use Silverlink to go from West Hampstead to Highbury & Islington. Possible or do I need to fork out extra as the train flirts with Z3 at Hampstead Heath? The Zone 2/3 border was slyly moved south of Hampstead Heath station several years ago, even though Hampstead Heath is nearer the centre of London than Hampstead tube station (Zones 2/3). This made my Zones 1and 2 travelcard invalid for westward journeys further than Gospel Oak, even though after Hampstead Heath the next five stations are once again in Zone 2. Grr. Guy |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Nestor Badudoy wrote:
I was looking at the map. Apparently, unless I'm readnig wrong, the line is in Z3 from Kew to South Action, then a one stop venture into Z2 for Acton Central, then back to Z3 for one stop (Willseden), then back and forth! Why not make the line an exception and allow Z2 and Z3 tickets (like, for example, Tramlink)? Why not just shift the zone 2/3 boundary, so that Acton Central is in Z3 and Hampstead Heath is in Z2. As it stands, there are no possible in-zone journeys for those stations! I'd also argue for the stations where the line crosses the boundaries to be in both zones, since these are Willesden Junction and Stratford, both of which are useful interchanges and should be available from both sides. tom -- So the moon is approximately 24 toasters from S****horpe. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Willesden Junction used to be a boundary station, then they made it Z3 only.
I guess they wanted increased revenues from all the services that ran thru there (e.g. the old North London Lines services from Richmond and the cross-London services from Clapham Junction and beyond). I agree that Stratford would be a good boundary station, but that wouldn't happen, esp when the CTRL opens up thru that area. INCREASED REVENUE! Nes. -- Please remove the spam-deflecting X's to reply directly to me - or simply reply to the group! -- "Tom Anderson" wrote in message ... On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Nestor Badudoy wrote: I was looking at the map. Apparently, unless I'm readnig wrong, the line is in Z3 from Kew to South Action, then a one stop venture into Z2 for Acton Central, then back to Z3 for one stop (Willseden), then back and forth! Why not make the line an exception and allow Z2 and Z3 tickets (like, for example, Tramlink)? Why not just shift the zone 2/3 boundary, so that Acton Central is in Z3 and Hampstead Heath is in Z2. As it stands, there are no possible in-zone journeys for those stations! I'd also argue for the stations where the line crosses the boundaries to be in both zones, since these are Willesden Junction and Stratford, both of which are useful interchanges and should be available from both sides. tom -- So the moon is approximately 24 toasters from S****horpe. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nestor Badudoy wrote:
Willesden Junction used to be a boundary station, then they made it Z3 only. I guess they wanted increased revenues from all the services that ran thru there (e.g. the old North London Lines services from Richmond and the cross-London services from Clapham Junction and beyond). I agree that Stratford would be a good boundary station, but that wouldn't happen, esp when the CTRL opens up thru that area. INCREASED REVENUE! Yes, I think revenue is the point. Otherwise you could get a very long way on a 1-zone ticket. It wasn't always so. In the 70s there was a 25p day return to any station on the line, though it admittedly only went to Broad Street then. Useful for getting from west to east London cheaply. Colin McKenzie |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Nestor Badudoy
writes I was looking at the map. Apparently, unless I'm readnig wrong, the line is in Z3 from Kew to South Action, then a one stop venture into Z2 for Acton Central, then back to Z3 for one stop (Willseden), then back and forth! Why not make the line an exception and allow Z2 and Z3 tickets (like, for example, Tramlink)? Am I missing something? Yes. The boundary zig-zags across that line *deliberately* to stop you being able to go from Acton to Stratford (almost) on a Z2 ticket. Zonal systems are still intended to make the cost of a journey be based on the distance you travel. For a network of radial lines, concentric zones work quite well, but an orbital line like the NLL breaks that model. Hence the change to the boundaries. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Clive D. W. Feather wrote:
In article , Nestor Badudoy writes I was looking at the map. Apparently, unless I'm readnig wrong, the line is in Z3 from Kew to South Action, then a one stop venture into Z2 for Acton Central, then back to Z3 for one stop (Willseden), then back and forth! Why not make the line an exception and allow Z2 and Z3 tickets (like, for example, Tramlink)? Am I missing something? Yes. The boundary zig-zags across that line *deliberately* to stop you being able to go from Acton to Stratford (almost) on a Z2 ticket. That explains Hampstead Heath, but not Acton Central or Willesden Junction - having either of those in the 'right' zone would only extend the longest one-zone journey by two stops. And hey, you can do the whole thing on a Z23 ticket! Well, from Kew Gardens, anyway. Zonal systems are still intended to make the cost of a journey be based on the distance you travel. For a network of radial lines, concentric zones work quite well, but an orbital line like the NLL breaks that model. Hence the change to the boundaries. I'd wondered if that was the case, but it just seemed too silly. Surely the whole *point* of orbital lines is to encourage journeys like that; if i have to pay for two zones to get from Acton to the east end, i might as well take the Central line! And yes, Z12 is more expensive than Z23, but it's also a lot faster. tom -- The revolving disc of plagues is particularly fun. -- greengolux |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Tom Anderson writes Zonal systems are still intended to make the cost of a journey be based on the distance you travel. For a network of radial lines, concentric zones work quite well, but an orbital line like the NLL breaks that model. Hence the change to the boundaries. I'd wondered if that was the case, but it just seemed too silly. Surely the whole *point* of orbital lines is to encourage journeys like that; No: orbital lines are built for various reasons (and that particular one is a hodge-podge). As it is, you get a fair discount for the orbital journey (a Z23 fare instead of a Z1-3 one). Places with significant numbers of orbital lines use a "tiled" system of zones rather than concentric ones. Look at Copenhagen or Tyne & Wear. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
London - Met widened lines query. | London Transport | |||
London Underground Lines - additional peak resources | London Transport | |||
North London Line AC/DC question | London Transport | |||
North Greenwich car park question | London Transport | |||
Crossing of the Victoria and Piccadilly lines north of Finsbury Park | London Transport |