London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 26th 04, 09:13 AM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,577
Default Councillors crush tube depot plans

"kevin smith" wrote in message
news

Personally I'm interested because I live close to
Chalfont and Latimer tube station and I'm wondering
if I'll be woken up by 66s whizzing
by on their way to the new depot from Aylesbury.


I hate to say this - its not up to YOU to dictate
how much traffic uses a railway line,


He didn't say it was up to him, he just said he was interested. And you
obviously didn't hate saying that, or you wouldn't have bothered saying it,
because nothing he said warranted your hate-filled response.

If they do rebuild this depot and I Hope they do
It will take more lorries off the road


No it won't, unless you mean the road in Ruislip.

NIMBYS Make me sick "!!!!


Good, then you'll know how your top posting makes normal people feel.

--
John Rowland - Spamtrapped
Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html
A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood.
That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line -
It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes


  #2   Report Post  
Old September 26th 04, 09:37 AM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default Councillors crush tube depot plans

In message , at 10:13:02 on Sun,
26 Sep 2004, John Rowland
remarked:
If they do rebuild this depot and I Hope they do
It will take more lorries off the road


No it won't, unless you mean the road in Ruislip.


The depot will receive material by canal, and deliver it by train. In
both cases cutting lorries out of the equation.
--
Roland Perry
  #3   Report Post  
Old September 26th 04, 11:20 AM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 45
Default Councillors crush tube depot plans


"Roland Perry" wrote in message
.uk...
In message , at 10:13:02 on Sun,
26 Sep 2004, John Rowland
remarked:
If they do rebuild this depot and I Hope they do
It will take more lorries off the road


No it won't, unless you mean the road in Ruislip.


The depot will receive material by canal, and deliver it by train. In
both cases cutting lorries out of the equation.


That's just for the building work, and not all of it. Rails will be
delivered by one train twice a month and offloaded onto another for the work
to be done. You then have around 10 cars a day driving there on local roads
plus a few lorries.
After the site is built the canal unloading equipment will be removed and
the canalbank replanted. Surprisingly they complain about the canal (an
industrial transport link) being used again for work and not pleasure
purposes.
They say the depot will only be there for 15 years but I can see this
becoming permanent.

Nick


  #4   Report Post  
Old September 26th 04, 11:57 AM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default Councillors crush tube depot plans

In message , at 12:20:08 on Sun, 26
Sep 2004, Nick Pedley remarked:

You then have around 10 cars a day driving there on local roads


Oh dear, what a disaster! Our thoughts are with you.
--
Roland Perry
  #5   Report Post  
Old September 27th 04, 08:57 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 45
Default Councillors crush tube depot plans


"Roland Perry" wrote in message
.uk...
In message , at 12:20:08 on Sun, 26
Sep 2004, Nick Pedley remarked:

You then have around 10 cars a day driving there on local roads


Oh dear, what a disaster! Our thoughts are with you.


As I don't live there, it's not directly a problem for me. Any problems for
me will be with tracks falling apart when I want to use the trains that run
on them.
Will 10 *extra* cars a day cause a major headache there?
And why go for a temporary 15year depot when tracks will always need
renewing?

(Yes, I should have said that *extra* in the first post!)

Nick




  #6   Report Post  
Old September 29th 04, 02:36 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2003
Posts: 5
Default Councillors crush tube depot plans

After the site is built the canal unloading equipment will be removed and
the canalbank replanted. Surprisingly they complain about the canal (an
industrial transport link) being used again for work and not pleasure
purposes.
They say the depot will only be there for 15 years but I can see this
becoming permanent.


If the canal is to be used for just bringing in the materials to build the
depot, then could it be used to bring the track materials in as well to keep
the NIMBY's quiet?

Paul
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bombay Railway [was: "Super-dense crush load..."] Mizter T London Transport 0 May 1st 10 05:30 PM
Plans to close Wembley Park tube ticket station burkey[_2_] London Transport 6 March 25th 10 07:39 PM
Councillors back tube opposition JWBA68 London Transport 0 October 8th 04 11:54 AM
Councillors crush tube depot plans JWBA68 London Transport 0 September 25th 04 12:16 PM
New depot plans not enough to satisfy residents JWBA68 London Transport 18 July 5th 04 10:30 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017