Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JWBA68" wrote in message ... CONTROVERSIAL plans to build a tube depot in Croxley Green have been quashed by Three Rivers District Council. London Underground wants to build a new depot on Green Belt land at Long Valley Wood to replace its existing one at Ruislip. How would this benefit the Central Line, which is what Ruislip depot serves? Are they proposing loads of empty stock movements from the Central Line via the depot curve onto the Uxbridge branch (reverse), then to Harrow-on-the-Hill (reverse) and up to Watford? Sounds like someone has got their depots confused. Replacing Neasden would make more sense, transferring Metropolitan maintenance to the new depot, either together with the Jubilee stock or by leaving Neasden as a Jubilee *only* depot. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jack Taylor" wrote in message
. .. London Underground wants to build a new depot on Green Belt land at Long Valley Wood to replace its existing one at Ruislip. How would this benefit the Central Line, which is what Ruislip depot serves? I imagine that LU were planning to move Ruislip's non-Central-Line activities to the Watford site, allowing more Central Line work to be done at Ruislip, so that a replacement for the doomed White City depot would not need to be found. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland wrote:
"Jack Taylor" wrote in message . .. London Underground wants to build a new depot on Green Belt land at Long Valley Wood to replace its existing one at Ruislip. How would this benefit the Central Line, which is what Ruislip depot serves? I imagine that LU were planning to move Ruislip's non-Central-Line activities to the Watford site, allowing more Central Line work to be done at Ruislip, so that a replacement for the doomed White City depot would not need to be found. This is in fact a proposal by Metronet (not LU) to build a depot for track renewal work on disused railway land next to the Grand Union Canal south of Croxley station next to Long Valley Wood. The land was formerly the Tip Sidings where LU used to dump building rubble etc. The connection is still in place off the southbound line from Croxley just before it crosses the canal. We had a thread in u.t.l about this in July this year called "New depot plans not enough to satisfy residents". -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bombay Railway [was: "Super-dense crush load..."] | London Transport | |||
Plans to close Wembley Park tube ticket station | London Transport | |||
Councillors back tube opposition | London Transport | |||
Councillors crush tube depot plans | London Transport | |||
New depot plans not enough to satisfy residents | London Transport |