Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob" wrote in message ...
It's about 70 miles St Pancras to the tunnel, so: 180 mph = 23 min 160 mph = 26 min 150 mph = 28 min 140 mph = 30 min 90 mph = 47 min Trains running at 140 mph adds only 5 min, but makes the commuter problem much, much easier. (Velocities are max, I know average speeds will be less, but the logic is the same). In my world, 30-23 is 7 not 5. Sorry - but anyway, St Pancras to Ebbsfleet, and the North Downs tunnel, speeds will be limited by tunnel design. Assuming the same acceleration, a train desinged for 140 mph would only be a few minutes behind a 186 mph train by the time they get to Ashford. As pointed out elesewhere, this is well within the frequency requirements of the line, especially after Ebbsfleet. Anyway, the point of the line is to cut as much as possible off the journey time between London and Paris / Brussels. Running trains at 186mph is the plan - your commuter trains at 140mph would get in the way. Since the technology exists for 186mph running, why not just build the damn trains instead of messing things up with a stupid fudge. Your kind of thinking is why things always turn to crap in this country. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
LU delay compensation | London Transport | |||
Underground delay vouchers | London Transport | |||
stansted express delay | London Transport | |||
Train Delay Cartoon... | London Transport | |||
CTRL Domestics will run to Dover | London Transport News |