Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Terry wrote to uk.transport.london on Mon, 1 Nov 2004:
In message , Mrs Redboots writes Stuart wrote to uk.transport.london on Sun, 31 Oct 2004: What is HRA and what is 5/-?? I don't know HRA, but 5/- is our old currency, what used to be called "five shillings". Now 25p, but in those days it was a lot of money! Maybe the equivalent of £50 or thereabouts. Not that much! 5 shillings in 1930 was worth about 12 pounds today - so not bad for a short flight. As little as that? Hmm..... you could support a family on £300 a year, back then, and now you would want, what, a minimum of £20,000. Okay some things (notably communications) are infinitely cheaper now than they were then, but if you express 5 shillings as a fraction of the annual salary, it would be more like £2,400 of today's money. -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 31 October 2004 |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Mrs Redboots
wrote: Not that much! 5 shillings in 1930 was worth about 12 pounds today - so not bad for a short flight. As little as that? Hmm..... you could support a family on £300 a year, back then, and now you would want, what, a minimum of £20,000. Okay some things (notably communications) are infinitely cheaper now than they were then, but if you express 5 shillings as a fraction of the annual salary, it would be more like £2,400 of today's money. Uh? 5/- is 1/1200 of £300. So today's equivalent would be 1/1200 of £20K = £16.67 surely? -- Tony Bryer |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is vague, but I remember reading something once that the Ace of
Spades was popular with flying types in the 1930's and some used to fly there. Presumably there was some clear area nearby for them to land on, though the recreation ground would possibly be too small. I go round the Hook roundabout each night on the way home, having come down Woodstock Lane, up the n/bound sliproad and then back down to Esher. This is to aviod the hideous queues on the Esher-Kingston road via Long Ditton. When I was a child in the 70's I recall the Silly Isles, (I think it was always stupid silly as opposed to islands off Cornwall), had a different layout with more than one roundabout as now, hence the name. In the same location, I heard a story that the railway bridge nearby over the Hampton Court-Esher Road was constructed wider than necessary as it was intended the road would be wider. The path on one side is quite wide. Don't knowe how true this is though. I don't often travel Londonbound on the A3, but I think the doors in the side of the Hook Underpass are still visible. Are there any up the road at Tolworth. I seem to think there are, but might be confusing the two. If there are were they put there as an option to do the same as at Hook, or just for maintainence access? Neill Stuart wrote in message k... Troy Steadman wrote: Farmer Brooms fields behind Kelvin Grove (just across the A3)? There is a picture in HRA of a 5/- a flight bi-plane in the 1930's. Don't suppose the pub owned the airfield but it was certainly very close to it, and a picture in the Cap in Hand makes the connection. Douglas Bader used the Ace but *didn't* fly to it AFAIK. Interesting, so behind Kelvin Gravoe would be what is now the King Edward Recreation Ground then? What is HRA and what is 5/-?? |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony Bryer wrote to uk.transport.london on Mon, 1 Nov 2004:
In article , Mrs Redboots wrote: Not that much! 5 shillings in 1930 was worth about 12 pounds today - so not bad for a short flight. As little as that? Hmm..... you could support a family on £300 a year, back then, and now you would want, what, a minimum of £20,000. Okay some things (notably communications) are infinitely cheaper now than they were then, but if you express 5 shillings as a fraction of the annual salary, it would be more like £2,400 of today's money. Uh? 5/- is 1/1200 of £300. So today's equivalent would be 1/1200 of £20K = £16.67 surely? Probably, probably..... never very good at maths, I wasn't. -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 31 October 2004 |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Neill Wood" wrote in message
om I don't often travel Londonbound on the A3, but I think the doors in the side of the Hook Underpass are still visible. So did I but there aren't any (I've just been to have a look) so the generators must have been at ground level which makes sense. The Cap in Hand (Wetherspoon) is one of the best *proper* locals in London, so I popped in there, Harry Hawker lived at corner of Hook Rd / Orchard Rd, so it is not surprising there was aviation interest. He is buried in the churchyard near his house (marked with a cross on the overlaid map). http://tinyurl.com/6fmq5 King Edward Rec is very large and quite capable I would suppose of accomodating bi-planes. I wonder if anyone's figured out how the people of Ace got home if they went to Mitcham on the 152? -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mrs Redboots" wrote in message
... Stuart wrote to uk.transport.london on Sun, 31 Oct 2004: What is HRA and what is 5/-?? I don't know HRA, but 5/- is our old currency, what used to be called "five shillings". Now 25p, but in those days it was a lot of money! Maybe the equivalent of £50 or thereabouts. Back in the 1950s, 5/- was about 25% above the hourly rate for labourers, so today's equivalent would be the minimum wage of £4.90 per hour+25%, say £6.12. That's a factor of about 24 to 1. -- Terry Harper, Web Co-ordinator, The Omnibus Society 75th Anniversary 2004, see http://www.omnibussoc.org/75th.htm E-mail: URL: http://www.terry.harper.btinternet.co.uk/ |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 17:58:22 on Mon, 1
Nov 2004, Terry Harper remarked: Back in the 1950s, 5/- was about 25% above the hourly rate for labourers, so today's equivalent would be the minimum wage of £4.90 per hour+25%, say £6.12. That's a factor of about 24 to 1. Whereas the £300 vs £20,000 is 67:1 Perhaps the £300 was a little on the low side - being £1.50 an hour or 3 shillings and nine pence an hour. -- Roland Perry |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote to uk.transport.london on Mon, 1 Nov 2004:
In message , at 17:58:22 on Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Terry Harper remarked: Back in the 1950s, 5/- was about 25% above the hourly rate for labourers, so today's equivalent would be the minimum wage of £4.90 per hour+25%, say £6.12. That's a factor of about 24 to 1. Whereas the £300 vs £20,000 is 67:1 Perhaps the £300 was a little on the low side - being £1.50 an hour or 3 shillings and nine pence an hour. I was basing that on "Murder must Advertise", which I happen to be re-reading, where a senior copywriter in an advertising agency was earning £6.00 per week - I beg his pardon, £6/0/0, or £312 a year. And Lord Peter Wimsey, if you recall, learning the trade, only made £4/0/0 a week, or £208. Yet this wasn't considered particularly low.... -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 31 October 2004 |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Terry Harper
writes Back in the 1950s, 5/- was about 25% above the hourly rate for labourers, so today's equivalent would be the minimum wage of £4.90 per hour+25%, say £6.12. That's a factor of about 24 to 1. Why should the hourly rate of labourers in the 1950s have anything to do with either the matter under discussion (currency value in the 1930s) or the minimum wage today? Rather than guessing, why not try one of the many useful economic history reference machines, which is what I did: http://eh.net/hmit/ppowerbp/ Although only programmed up to 2002 it gives: £4.91 in 2002 has the same "purchase power" as 5s in 1950. £12.16 in 2002 has the same "purchase power" as 5s in 1930. -- Paul Terry |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Terry wrote in message ...
In message , CIG_BIG_CIG writes What I meant by this question was if I was at the roundabout I can only go towards London on the A3 there is no direct access to the southbound A3 you have to go to Esher first. Has it never been possible to get directly from Hook to the A3 southbound? Yes, as has already been explained, before the Esher by-pass was built the road that is now the A309 heading towards Esher *was* the southbound A3 - so in those days there was indeed direct access from the Hook roundabout. It was only after the A3 got "moved" (due to the opening of the Esher bypass) that the former direct access became instead direct access to the A309. Aha! The movement of the A3 explains it all! Now logic suggests if the Ace of Spades came first then did Tolworth and New Malden come second and third respectively? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Strand Underpass | London Transport | |||
Missed the bus heading towards Hook? | London Transport | |||
Obscure dictionary trivia | London Transport | |||
What? Kingsway underpass? | London Transport | |||
A13 - Prince Regent Lane underpass now open | London Transport |