Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard J." wrote in message . uk... Pyromancer wrote: Upon the miasma of midnight, a darkling spirit identified as S.Byers gently breathed: The extent of the damage in the Berkshire crash was caused by two major factors apart from the speed of the train and the limited view of the hero driver. These we 1/ the rear power car, still under full power, caused much of the crumpling and jack knifing, and This is believed to be incorrect, but is in the interim HSE report which might explain why it got posted here. The unfounded idea that the rear power car was still under full power was certainly NOT in the interim HSE report. It was an ignorant rumour that I believe was mentioned first on Sky News a few hours after the crash. -- I can see where this has come about. There is a BBC website report that states "The front of the First Great Western train ploughed into the embankment, while the rear power car on the train continued to propel the train forward, investigators found." What they have missed out is "momentum of", which is in the HSE report. Dave |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dave wrote: "Richard J." wrote in message . uk... Pyromancer wrote: Upon the miasma of midnight, a darkling spirit identified as S.Byers gently breathed: The extent of the damage in the Berkshire crash was caused by two major factors apart from the speed of the train and the limited view of the hero driver. These we 1/ the rear power car, still under full power, caused much of the crumpling and jack knifing, and This is believed to be incorrect, but is in the interim HSE report which might explain why it got posted here. The unfounded idea that the rear power car was still under full power was certainly NOT in the interim HSE report. It was an ignorant rumour that I believe was mentioned first on Sky News a few hours after the crash. -- I can see where this has come about. There is a BBC website report that states "The front of the First Great Western train ploughed into the embankment, while the rear power car on the train continued to propel the train forward, investigators found." What they have missed out is "momentum of", which is in the HSE report. ....and the investigators might have pointed out that the momentum of the rear eight coaches acting on the (derailed) leading power car was a lot greater than the momentum of the rear power car. David |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
1/ the rear power car, still under full power, caused much of the
crumpling and jack knifing, and This is believed to be incorrect, but is in the interim HSE report which might explain why it got posted here. The unfounded idea that the rear power car was still under full power was certainly NOT in the interim HSE report. It was an ignorant rumour that I believe was mentioned first on Sky News a few hours after the crash. -- I can see where this has come about. There is a BBC website report that states "The front of the First Great Western train ploughed into the embankment, while the rear power car on the train continued to propel the train forward, investigators found." What they have missed out is "momentum of", which is in the HSE report. ...and the investigators might have pointed out that the momentum of the rear eight coaches acting on the (derailed) leading power car was a lot greater than the momentum of the rear power car. David I'm going to wander off topic here slightly... but i hope it's still relevant. Wasn't the Lockington accident made worse by the fact that a heavier DMU set was at the rear? If i recall correctly wasn't it a 105/114 pairing? Making it even worse the 105 trailer car was leading (thus the lightest carriage of the four), and class 105s being of shorter body length and pretty appalling crashworthiness wise, would have made things worse. Shorter bodylength being worse cos damage from front and behind on the first carriage would be more catastrophic. The 105 trailer struck the van on the level crossing and then the heavier carriages behind kept it going and lots of track was damaged leading to serious damage to all four vehicles. So maybe there is a point about the heavier vehicles behind keeping the train moving. Slamdoor Mat. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The dangers of the subways of Elephant & Castle... | London Transport | |||
South Eastern expand High Speed Service | London Transport | |||
High speed line routeing | London Transport | |||
LCR plans high-speed line to north | London Transport News | |||
Wood Green High Road speed limit | London Transport |