Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Stevie D wrote:
Yes, the railways may lose a small amount of revenue by closing Waterloo International. But the additional cost of maintaining and serving two international terminal stations in London would be far higher than the revenue that will be lost from the few passengers who will defect to air travel or other means. I don't see it quite that way. They're opening two new intermediate stations, after all: they clearly feel they can "afford" the cost of running those. Surely the key point is that the Waterloo route has no sensible access to 25kV overhead power, let alone to the high-speed line? So they'd be stuck with the existing third-rail infrastructure as far as Fawkham Junction, which, in spite of past upgrades, still leaves E* trains under-powered. Nevertheless, if you search the web you find lots of places where it's reported that some E* traffic to/from Waterloo will be maintained. So if it's true that E* is going to totally abandon Waterloo, either someone has been telling porkies in the past, or the intentions have changed. Some improvements in connecting services would be most welcome. But the past record of joined-up thinking in this land does not exactly fill me with hope. all the best |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message . ac.uk,
Alan J. Flavell writes Nevertheless, if you search the web you find lots of places where it's reported that some E* traffic to/from Waterloo will be maintained. So if it's true that E* is going to totally abandon Waterloo, either someone has been telling porkies in the past, or the intentions have changed. The whole reason why this thread started is because Eurostar announced last week that they have finally decided to totally abandon any facility at Waterloo! -- Paul Terry |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Paul Terry wrote:
So if it's true that E* is going to totally abandon Waterloo, either someone has been telling porkies in the past, or the intentions have changed. The whole reason why this thread started is because Eurostar announced last week that they have finally decided to totally abandon any facility at Waterloo! Er, as I read it, they *announced* last week that a decision has been made. They don't say when that decision had been taken. hth |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Waterloo - KX post Eurostar move | London Transport | |||
Eurostar to quit Waterloo | London Transport | |||
Check-in for Eurostar at Waterloo | London Transport | |||
Eurostar @ Waterloo | London Transport | |||
New Eurostar line from Waterloo | London Transport |