Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Dave Arquati wrote:
Aidan Stanger wrote: Dave Arquati wrote: Aidan Stanger wrote: Tom Anderson wrote: On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Dave Arquati wrote: then following the North London Line route to Stratford. Clearly, the only sensible solution is up the West Anglia from Hackney. I couldn't disagree more. Firstly, although Stratford's links with much of Central London are good, there is no direct line to Kings Cross. It's always Stratford, Stratford, Stratford! What's so great about Stratford anyway? Bah! Secondly, Hackney's links with Stratford are currently inadequate - the trains are infrequent, short and overcrowded. Thirdly, a well designed Hackney station would incorporate Hackney Downs station, so you would still get the benefits while the trains continue to serve the popular destination of Liverpool Street. Stratford will have a link to Farringdon with CR1; it's only a short hop from there to King's Cross. And an upgrade of the NLL would go towards improving links between Hackney and Stratford. I would say that giving the West Anglia lines (particularly the Lea Valley) a direct link to the West End would give greater regeneration benefits than going to Stratford, which will already have some impressive new links. But if the West Anglia lines gained a direct service to the West End, it would be at the expense of their direct service to the City, so they'd be worse off. Fair enough, they'd be worse off if CR2 replaced their direct services to the City. It wouldn't have to replace it - there could be two routes south from Hackney. I'm not sure if this would be a good idea from an operational point of view, though - shades of the Bakerloo. On the other hand, if this was going to be CR2 rather than CH, ie a NR-style moderate-frequency timetabled service, rather than a LU-style high-frequency random service, it might work alright. However, extra capacity and better connections will be urgently needed further up the Lea Valley and near to Stansted will be needed if government plans for significant house-building in this area are given the go-ahead. A CR1 branch up the Lea Valley Line would do this, though. I refuse to believe CR1 can't support three interfaces at each end. Or, if it's stuck at two, maybe this route will be added when the Docklands branch is eventually cut back to non-existence! The Victoria line will also be in urgent need of congestion relief. Taking over the Central Line from Stratford serves neither objective, And that's the rub - even if CH did take over the NLL route to Stratford, where would it go afterwards? The Central Line is daft, the GE's Crossrailed already, which basically only leaves the Lea Valley Line - and KX - Hackney - Stratford - Tottenham Hale is, if you'll excuse the pun, completely loopy! Unless you're proposing to take over the DLR? tom -- A is for Absinthe, for which I now thirst |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BBC - Soho shops make way for Crossrail | London Transport | |||
BBC - Soho shops make way for Crossrail | London Transport | |||
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal' | London Transport | |||
BBC News Report - Crossrail | London Transport | |||
BBC - Crossrail gets £230m BAA funding | London Transport |