Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message
... I remember one plan postulated when the East-West Rail study was commissioned a few years ago was to make Goblin the primary cross-London freight line (with a new junction at Forest Gate and a new tunnel from Gospel Oak to Primrose Hill)? Its advantages being that it avoids freight clashing with Crossrail on the GE, and removes any freight activity from the NLL (and WLL if you route Channel freight via the CTRL at Dagenham). Any news on that plan? TfL recently did a report called "Freight on rail in London": http://www.tfl.gov.uk/rail/downloads/pdf/freight.pdf They don't say too much about it - their emphasis being on the Felixtowe - Nuneaton bypass - but they do say that the proposed port development at Shellhaven, "cannot be supported without [...] upgrades to the Tottenham and Hampstead Line and the Hampstead section of the North London Line at some point.". 'Tottenham and Hampstead Line' is code (or even the traditional name) for Goblin. Interesting. Thanks for the link. The East-West study you mention has the more involved idea of a 'freight focused route': http://www.sra.gov.uk/publications/g...other2001_05_0 3eastwest.pdf That's the one I was thinking of, yep. And is more explicit, not to mention ambitious. The tunnel bit is about bypassing the Hampstead Tunnel, which is clear to W8 gauge, not big enough for heavy cargo. If a way could be found to 4-track the NLL from Dalston to Stratford, to avoid conflict with Crossrail 1 at Forest Gate and to avoid conflict with the ELL/NLL between Camden and Dalston (i.e. ELL/NLL running on the southern pair Dalston-Canonbury - see Mod Rlys Dec issue - but NLL towards Hampstead leaving to the north at Camden, therefore requiring that freight crosses the path of the NLL passenger services), then the Goblin upgrade and the tunnel to Primrose Hill are unnecessary. But cost of 2 flyovers and the 4-tracking would be an issue.... They then go on to suggest, for a mere 215 million, a tunnel under the Thames, so traffic from Kent can get up onto the GOBLin, thus relieving all the south London lines and the WLL and Hounslow Loop. Indeed. I wonder how much traffic would be able to use the CTRL and therefore avoid this tunnel being built (should it get that far of course - unlikely). Angus |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BBC - Soho shops make way for Crossrail | London Transport | |||
BBC - Soho shops make way for Crossrail | London Transport | |||
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal' | London Transport | |||
BBC News Report - Crossrail | London Transport | |||
BBC - Crossrail gets £230m BAA funding | London Transport |