Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sir Benjamin Nunn wrote:
"Nick Cooper" wrote in message ... On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:49:27 +0000, Jason wrote: Roger Evans, the transport spokesman, said: "This deal is beyond comprehension. It is an outrageous insult to every hard-working Londoner. Yet again we're seeing the unions holding the capital to ransom. They know the threat of strikes always pays off. The answer is to ban strikes on the Underground. Why is it an "insult"? It's not extra holidays - it's days off on account of extra hours worked! Well, I find it insulting as I don't get time off because of the extra hours I work, and I would imagine the millions of people working for the many companies in many industries that don't leech of public money, and don't have a corrupt union propping them up might feel similarly about the situation. Do you regularly work a 37.5 hour week but only get paid for 35? Underground staff do and the extra 2.5 hours per week are rolled up into additional rest days. Bear in mind also that they work on any of the seven days according to their roster. Try establishing some facts before getting on your high horse and deciding to feel "insulted" b ecause other people are "insulted" by the exhorbitant amounts paid to some other people who produce absolutely nothing useful for society. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brimstone" wrote in message ... Well, I find it insulting as I don't get time off because of the extra hours I work, and I would imagine the millions of people working for the many companies in many industries that don't leech of public money, and don't have a corrupt union propping them up might feel similarly about the situation. Do you regularly work a 37.5 hour week but only get paid for 35? I regularly work weeks of 40+ hours, and in my contract I specifically had to sign an opt-out of the European Law on the maximum 48 hour week, and I get paid a fixed salary based on a notional 37.5 hour week, with no overtime or time off over and above that. And compared to some people I know I have it pretty easy. But very few companies functioning within the constraints of real world economics could afford their staff the joyride that LU staff seem to benefit from. BTN |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh dear...you have a problem. And you signed this piece of paper about
hours. That was silly want it? Join the tube if ou feel its such a good lurk....always looking for good people to be CSAs. Or would that be a little too much work for you? Malcolm "Sir Benjamin Nunn" wrote in message ... "Brimstone" wrote in message ... Well, I find it insulting as I don't get time off because of the extra hours I work, and I would imagine the millions of people working for the many companies in many industries that don't leech of public money, and don't have a corrupt union propping them up might feel similarly about the situation. Do you regularly work a 37.5 hour week but only get paid for 35? I regularly work weeks of 40+ hours, and in my contract I specifically had to sign an opt-out of the European Law on the maximum 48 hour week, and I get paid a fixed salary based on a notional 37.5 hour week, with no overtime or time off over and above that. And compared to some people I know I have it pretty easy. But very few companies functioning within the constraints of real world economics could afford their staff the joyride that LU staff seem to benefit from. BTN |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sir Benjamin Nunn" wrote in message ... "Brimstone" wrote in message ... Well, I find it insulting as I don't get time off because of the extra hours I work, and I would imagine the millions of people working for the many companies in many industries that don't leech of public money, and don't have a corrupt union propping them up might feel similarly about the situation. Do you regularly work a 37.5 hour week but only get paid for 35? I regularly work weeks of 40+ hours, and in my contract I specifically had to sign an opt-out of the European Law on the maximum 48 hour week, and I get paid a fixed salary based on a notional 37.5 hour week, with no overtime or time off over and above that. And compared to some people I know I have it pretty easy. But very few companies functioning within the constraints of real world economics could afford their staff the joyride that LU staff seem to benefit from. So you'll be signing up with LU quite soon then? |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I forgot to mention.....
You think you got it tough.....We used to live in a shoe box. "Brimstone" wrote in message ... "Sir Benjamin Nunn" wrote in message ... "Brimstone" wrote in message ... Well, I find it insulting as I don't get time off because of the extra hours I work, and I would imagine the millions of people working for the many companies in many industries that don't leech of public money, and don't have a corrupt union propping them up might feel similarly about the situation. Do you regularly work a 37.5 hour week but only get paid for 35? I regularly work weeks of 40+ hours, and in my contract I specifically had to sign an opt-out of the European Law on the maximum 48 hour week, and I get paid a fixed salary based on a notional 37.5 hour week, with no overtime or time off over and above that. And compared to some people I know I have it pretty easy. But very few companies functioning within the constraints of real world economics could afford their staff the joyride that LU staff seem to benefit from. So you'll be signing up with LU quite soon then? |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Malcolm & Nika" wrote in message ... I forgot to mention..... You think you got it tough.....We used to live in a shoe box. Luxury!!!! |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sir Benjamin Nunn" wrote in message ... "Brimstone" wrote in message ... Well, I find it insulting as I don't get time off because of the extra hours I work, and I would imagine the millions of people working for the many companies in many industries that don't leech of public money, and don't have a corrupt union propping them up might feel similarly about the situation. Do you regularly work a 37.5 hour week but only get paid for 35? I regularly work weeks of 40+ hours, and in my contract I specifically had to sign an opt-out of the European Law on the maximum 48 hour week, and I get paid a fixed salary based on a notional 37.5 hour week, with no overtime or time off over and above that. Unless you work for one of a few specific occupations, that's not legal. Why don't you wait until after you're no longer on probation and then inform your employer in writing that you are opting back in? In any event, you shouldn't resent other people getting a better deal than you did. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sir Benjamin Nunn" wrote in message ... "Brimstone" wrote in message ... Well, I find it insulting as I don't get time off because of the extra hours I work, and I would imagine the millions of people working for the many companies in many industries that don't leech of public money, and don't have a corrupt union propping them up might feel similarly about the situation. Do you regularly work a 37.5 hour week but only get paid for 35? I regularly work weeks of 40+ hours, and in my contract I specifically had to sign an opt-out of the European Law on the maximum 48 hour week, and I get paid a fixed salary based on a notional 37.5 hour week, with no overtime or time off over and above that. And compared to some people I know I have it pretty easy. But very few companies functioning within the constraints of real world economics could afford their staff the joyride that LU staff seem to benefit from. BTN You cannot be forced to sign an opt-out - that 'contract' is illegal. Inform them that you are opting back in. If they try to sack you, pass you over for promotion, or suffer any other unmerited discrimination you can take them to the cleaners at a tribunal. Of course, if you had a union to back your corner your employer wouldn't try this on in the first place. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 21:56:43 -0000, "Colin"
wrote: BTN You cannot be forced to sign an opt-out - that 'contract' is illegal. Oh really, they cant be 'forced' to promote one or give decent payrises either, or be flexible w.r.t working practices either. Inform them that you are opting back in. If they try to sack you, pass you over for promotion, or suffer any other unmerited discrimination you can take them to the cleaners at a tribunal. That only works with wimmin & public sector wasters. *No* tube driver is worth 35 grand for a 35 hour week period. Let alone the BIKs which come with the job. There again we are talking members of an organisation who threatened to walk out when a well connected class warrior was fired after being found drunk behind the wheel of a crashed LU van full of nicked copper. Not surprisingly 'management' caved in as they always do. There again, its to be expected in an organisation of time serving incompetents which takes 12-18 months to bring staff back from paid maternity leave, all because they allegedly don't have 'the resources' to process the relevant paperwork. Of course, if you had a union to back your corner your employer wouldn't try this on in the first place. When you beam back in from the 1970s tell me. greg -- There's fighting on the left and marching on the right Don't look up in the sky, you're gonna die of fright Here comes the razors edge |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BBC: Thames cable car given go-ahead | London Transport | |||
Mkt headlines for the month of May--- Given in News Letters | London Transport | |||
Congestion Charge wrongly given | London Transport | |||
Congestion Charge wrongly given | London Transport | |||
Tube staff are given 52 days holiday | London Transport |