Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Two questions regarding the deployment of these new 5-car trains:
1) are there routes on which they will completely replace the Class 465 and 466s? 2) if so, for those routes where the platform length limits trains to eight carriages, will all current 6- and 8-car trains be replaced by 5-car trains, or can they operate 10-car trains where doors on the two rearmost carriages won't open at all stations? S R |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "S R" wrote in message ... Two questions regarding the deployment of these new 5-car trains: 1) are there routes on which they will completely replace the Class 465 and 466s? 2) if so, for those routes where the platform length limits trains to eight carriages, will all current 6- and 8-car trains be replaced by 5-car trains, or can they operate 10-car trains where doors on the two rearmost carriages won't open at all stations? AIUI they will operate on Charing Cross and Cannon Street services. All platforms on these routes were extended to take 10-car trains in the 1950s, and many were further extended to 12-car length in the abortive scheme of the early 1990s. They will not normally operate on Victoria/Blackfriars routes, where many suburban platforms can still only take 8-car trains. There won't be enough 376s to displace Networkers completely from any route. Peter |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Masson" wrote in message
There won't be enough 376s to displace Networkers completely from any route. There are more than enough to cover specific routes entirely. 36 units must be more than enough to cover a service such as Hayes or Dartford via Greenwich (and excluding the obvious but silly answer of Bromley North). Surely both routes are entirely served from CS/CX so the short platforms issue does not arise. I can't see any reason why they'd diagram in such a way to be 376 only, but it could be done in theory, which is why I assume the OP asked the question. -- Nick -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nick Lawford wrote:
"Peter Masson" wrote in message There won't be enough 376s to displace Networkers completely from any route. There are more than enough to cover specific routes entirely. 36 units must be more than enough to cover a service such as Hayes or Dartford via Greenwich (and excluding the obvious but silly answer of Bromley North). Surely both routes are entirely served from CS/CX so the short platforms issue does not arise. I can't see any reason why they'd diagram in such a way to be 376 only, but it could be done in theory, which is why I assume the OP asked the question. -- Nick Bromley North has been using the new trains and they have also been down to Orpington and Sevenoaks. The routes through Grove Park are definetly getting all new Class 376 trains within the next year. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
James Looker wrote in message ...
Nick Lawford wrote: "Peter Masson" wrote in message There won't be enough 376s to displace Networkers completely from any route. There are more than enough to cover specific routes entirely. 36 units must be more than enough to cover a service such as Hayes or Dartford via Greenwich (and excluding the obvious but silly answer of Bromley North). Surely both routes are entirely served from CS/CX so the short platforms issue does not arise. I can't see any reason why they'd diagram in such a way to be 376 only, but it could be done in theory, which is why I assume the OP asked the question. -- Nick Bromley North has been using the new trains and they have also been down to Orpington and Sevenoaks. The routes through Grove Park are definetly getting all new Class 376 trains within the next year. No one seems to have news of a drastic change in the diagrams that would keep units on specific routes. That's why they can't be kept on journeys they are best suited to. The are already doing some "semi-fasts" via Woolwich and Lewisham. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MIG wrote:
James Looker wrote in message ... Nick Lawford wrote: "Peter Masson" wrote in message There won't be enough 376s to displace Networkers completely from any route. There are more than enough to cover specific routes entirely. 36 units must be more than enough to cover a service such as Hayes or Dartford via Greenwich (and excluding the obvious but silly answer of Bromley North). Surely both routes are entirely served from CS/CX so the short platforms issue does not arise. I can't see any reason why they'd diagram in such a way to be 376 only, but it could be done in theory, which is why I assume the OP asked the question. -- Nick Bromley North has been using the new trains and they have also been down to Orpington and Sevenoaks. The routes through Grove Park are definetly getting all new Class 376 trains within the next year. No one seems to have news of a drastic change in the diagrams that would keep units on specific routes. That's why they can't be kept on journeys they are best suited to. The are already doing some "semi-fasts" via Woolwich and Lewisham. I seem to recall having heard talk that (somehow) these trains were to be kept off longer distance trips such as beyond Dartford, and people here (on both uk.railway and u.t.l) pointing out how dificult that would be. Have TPTB finally given up the idea of keeping them off Gillingham services and the like? Robin |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I can't see any reason why they'd diagram in such a way to be 376 only, but it could be done in theory, which is why I assume the OP asked the question. My reason for asking was concern that routes limited by platform length to 8-car trains would see all their peak-period 6- and 8-car trains replaced by 5-car trains. S R |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
R.C. Payne wrote:
MIG wrote: James Looker wrote in message ... Nick Lawford wrote: "Peter Masson" wrote in message There won't be enough 376s to displace Networkers completely from any route. There are more than enough to cover specific routes entirely. 36 units must be more than enough to cover a service such as Hayes or Dartford via Greenwich (and excluding the obvious but silly answer of Bromley North). Surely both routes are entirely served from CS/CX so the short platforms issue does not arise. I can't see any reason why they'd diagram in such a way to be 376 only, but it could be done in theory, which is why I assume the OP asked the question. -- Nick Bromley North has been using the new trains and they have also been down to Orpington and Sevenoaks. The routes through Grove Park are definetly getting all new Class 376 trains within the next year. No one seems to have news of a drastic change in the diagrams that would keep units on specific routes. That's why they can't be kept on journeys they are best suited to. The are already doing some "semi-fasts" via Woolwich and Lewisham. I seem to recall having heard talk that (somehow) these trains were to be kept off longer distance trips such as beyond Dartford, and people here (on both uk.railway and u.t.l) pointing out how dificult that would be. Have TPTB finally given up the idea of keeping them off Gillingham services and the like? Robin They are diagrammed on the 17:46 from Cannon Street to Higham (Strood when tunnel re-opens in January) every day at the moment - 2 x 5 cars. The official line is that they will run to Gravesend in off-peak but may be used on longer journeys to/from Gillingham in the peak (also Orpington off-peak, Sevenoaks in Peak). In reality seats are likely to become available at Dartford (Coastbound) or earlier if you walk through the train (easier than most) and you will get a seat from longer out if you are London bound - that is if you want one!. Chris |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"R.C. Payne" wrote in message ...
MIG wrote: James Looker wrote in message ... Nick Lawford wrote: "Peter Masson" wrote in message There won't be enough 376s to displace Networkers completely from any route. There are more than enough to cover specific routes entirely. 36 units must be more than enough to cover a service such as Hayes or Dartford via Greenwich (and excluding the obvious but silly answer of Bromley North). Surely both routes are entirely served from CS/CX so the short platforms issue does not arise. I can't see any reason why they'd diagram in such a way to be 376 only, but it could be done in theory, which is why I assume the OP asked the question. -- Nick Bromley North has been using the new trains and they have also been down to Orpington and Sevenoaks. The routes through Grove Park are definetly getting all new Class 376 trains within the next year. No one seems to have news of a drastic change in the diagrams that would keep units on specific routes. That's why they can't be kept on journeys they are best suited to. The are already doing some "semi-fasts" via Woolwich and Lewisham. I seem to recall having heard talk that (somehow) these trains were to be kept off longer distance trips such as beyond Dartford, and people here (on both uk.railway and u.t.l) pointing out how dificult that would be. Have TPTB finally given up the idea of keeping them off Gillingham services and the like? Robin Maybe there will be a drastic change in the diagrams when they are all running, but I've certainly seen one doing Higham (would be Gillingham) to Charing Cross. I've seen them on the Hayes and Orpington lines, but it's hard to tell where they are going because, surprise surprise, the indicators are usually switched off. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"S R" wrote in message ...
I can't see any reason why they'd diagram in such a way to be 376 only, but it could be done in theory, which is why I assume the OP asked the question. My reason for asking was concern that routes limited by platform length to 8-car trains would see all their peak-period 6- and 8-car trains replaced by 5-car trains. S R I wouldn't be at all surprised. History shows a reduction in length when new stock is introduced. I guess we can take it that the introduction of five-car units is a confirmation that we will never see the twelve-car trains for which all those platforms were extended. Maybe there has been an improvement in availability, but only in the last couple of years has the peak-hour train length finally started to increase (to a maximum of ten), after the general reduction in length when the "Networkers" were introduced. It was galling to have to stand in shorter trains when they were introduced, having gone through all that disruption to extend the platforms for the "longer Networker trains". Soon after, some twelve-car slam-door trains on Ramsgate/Margate services to Cannon Street were replaced by eight-car 365s. Did the 365s ever run in longer formations than that? I can't remember seeing one. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SET 376 - A big disappointment | London Transport | |||
Class 376 train problems - South Eastern Trains | London Transport | |||
376 diagrams on SET website | London Transport | |||
I've been to London for business meetings and told myself that I'd be back to see London for myself. (rather than flying one day and out the next) I've used the tube briefly and my questions a | London Transport | |||
A couple of questions on Oystercards | London Transport |