Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mrs Redboots wrote:
All the same, it is maddening when a definite physical railway-line exists between the two places that you want to go, but "it is not a route" so that you have to change trains. absolutely.... and London is particularly infuriating for that. I think NR and TfL need to get a handle on cross-London connections. More intelligent use of existing tracks could ease so many terminal-to-terminal interchanges. At present the Circle Line is the usual answer and, frankly, that's never a good thing. For example, Paddington-WCML could be made easier by Silverlink stopping more semi-fast trains at Queens Park or Willesden Junction (would aid NLL too). Chiltern's West Hampstead plans (http://www.chilternrailways.co.uk/pa...roduction.html) are an excellent example of the sort of planning required. The Willesden/Old Oak area would be a superb location for another such interchange - under 1km between the two lines - though I can't see it ever happening. CC |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 23:30:16 +0000 (UTC), "Terry Harper"
said: "David Cantrell" wrote in message .. . I thought the reason for cutting it back was that the trains were running empty. They are not empty, just not overcrowded, while the other trains are often packed. OK, not entirely empty, but well under a quarter full, maybe as low as a tenth, at least whenever I see one arriving at or leaving from Victoria. -- David Cantrell | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Cantrell" wrote in message
... On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 23:30:16 +0000 (UTC), "Terry Harper" said: "David Cantrell" wrote in message .. . I thought the reason for cutting it back was that the trains were running empty. They are not empty, just not overcrowded, while the other trains are often packed. OK, not entirely empty, but well under a quarter full, maybe as low as a tenth, at least whenever I see one arriving at or leaving from Victoria. If you believe the SRA, during the rush hours they are about 80% or so loaded. -- Terry Harper, Web Co-ordinator, The Omnibus Society 75th Anniversary 2004, see http://www.omnibussoc.org/75th.htm E-mail: URL: http://www.terry.harper.btinternet.co.uk/ |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:02:44 +0000 (UTC), "Terry Harper"
said: "David Cantrell" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 23:30:16 +0000 (UTC), "Terry Harper" said: [Gatwick Express] are not empty, just not overcrowded, while the other trains are often packed. OK, not entirely empty, but well under a quarter full, maybe as low as a tenth, at least whenever I see one arriving at or leaving from Victoria. If you believe the SRA, during the rush hours they are about 80% or so loaded. Which, funnily enough, is when I see them most often! -- David Cantrell | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FROM GATWICK TO LIVERPOOL, QUESTION | London Transport | |||
Gatwick Express/Gold Card/Gatwick ticket machines | London Transport | |||
Trains to Moorgate now go via Liverpool Street | London Transport | |||
Bus Liverpool street (?) Bayswater | London Transport | |||
Closure of Liverpool Street this morning | London Transport |