Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clive D. W. Feather wrote:
D stock isn't any wider than C stock; it's limited where it can go because: * some stations (like Bayswater) can't fit 6*D though they can fit 6*C; * the suspension has been stiffened and it's therefore only allowed on track maintained appropriately (which, off-Line, means Acton Town to Northfields Depot). LOL! You can't have travelled on the District for several years if you think that D-stock can only run on track that has been "maintained appropriately". Seriously, Tube Prune's website* says "The poor quality of LU track has led to cracking in the bogie frames and some derailments due to the stiffness of the frame. The D Stock bogies are being replaced by new bogies similar to those supplied by Adtranz for the new Northern Line 1995 Tube Stock. These bogies have flexible frames designed to overcome the dreadful state of LU trackwork." That page was last updated a year ago, so maybe the bogie changes are now complete. Can anyone confirm this? * http://www.trainweb.org/tubeprune/Rolling%20Stock.htm -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2009 Stock loading gauge | London Transport | |||
Loading gauge question | London Transport | |||
CTRL loading gauge | London Transport | |||
DLR track gauge | London Transport | |||
LUL track gauge not the same as BR gauge? | London Transport |